Situating workplace surveillance: Ethics and computer based performance monitoring
Ethics and Information Technology 3 (3):209-221 (2001)
| Abstract | This paper examines the study of computer basedperformance monitoring (CBPM) in the workplaceas an issue dominated by questions of ethics.Its central contention paper is that anyinvestigation of ethical monitoring practice isinadequate if it simply applies best practiceguidelines to any one context to indicate,whether practice is, on balance, ethical or not. The broader social dynamics of access toprocedural and distributive justice examinedthrough a fine grained approach to the study ofworkplace social relations, and workplaceidentity construction, are also important here. This has three implications, which are examinedin the paper, and are as follows: First, thatit is vital for any empirical investigation ofthe ethics of CBPM practice to take intoaccount not only its compliance withpreexisting best practice guidelines, butalso the social relations which pervade thecontext of its application. Second, that thisnecessitates a particular epistemologicaltreatment of CBPM as something whose effectsare measurable and identifiable, as well assomething which has a socially constructedmeaning and is tropic in nature. Third, thatexisting debates against which this argument isset, which regard contrasting epistemologiesand ontologies as incompatible, should beaddressed, and an alternative introduced. Introducing situated knowledges (Haraway 1991)and material semiotic ontologies as such analternative, the paper proceeds to analyse theethics of a particular case of monitoringpractice, Norco. Drawing on Marx (1998) thepaper concludes that a fine grain analysis ofthe social is vital if we are to understandfully the ethics of monitoring in theworkplace. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStephen R. Hawk (1994). The Effects of Computerized Performance Monitoring: An Ethical Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12):949 - 957.
Karen D. Loch, Sue Conger & Effy Oz (1998). Ownership, Privacy and Monitoring in the Workplace: A Debate on Technology and Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (6):199-209.
Thomas J. Hodson, Fred Englander & Valerie Englander (1999). Ethical, Legal and Economic Aspects of Employer Monitoring of Employee Electronic Mail. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (1):99 - 108.
John D'Arcy & Anat Hovav (2009). Does One Size Fit All? Examining the Differential Effects of Is Security Countermeasures. Journal of Business Ethics 89:59 - 71.
Edward J. Ottensmeyer & Mark A. Heroux (1991). Ethics, Public Policy, and Managing Advanced Technologies: The Case of Electronic Surveillance. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (7):519 - 526.
G. Stoney Alder (1998). Ethical Issues in Electronic Performance Monitoring: A Consideration of Deontological and Teleological Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (7):729-743.
Marshall Schminke G. Stoney Alder, W. Noel Terry & Maribeth Kuenzi (2008). Employee Reactions to Internet Monitoring: The Moderating Role of Ethical Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 80 (3).
G. Stoney Alder, Marshall Schminke, Terry W. Noel & Maribeth Kuenzi (2008). Employee Reactions to Internet Monitoring: The Moderating Role of Ethical Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 80 (3):481 - 498.
Paul Attewell (1987). Big Brother and the Sweatshop: Computer Surveillance in the Automated Office. Sociological Theory 5 (1):87-100.
Seumas Miller & John Weckert (2000). Privacy, the Workplace and the Internet. Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):255 - 265.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads55 ( #18,223 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
