Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76:1 - 24 (2002)
|Abstract||Kant's claim that modality is a 'category' provides an approach to modality to be contrasted with Lewis's reductive analysis. Lewis's position is unsatisfactory, since it depends on an inherently modal conception of a world. This suggests that modality is 'primitive'; and the Kantian position is a prima facie plausible position of this kind, which is filled out by considering the relationship between modality and inference. This provides a context for comparing the Kantian position with Wright's non-cognitivist 'conventionalism'. Wright's position is vulnerable to the type of argument used against ethical non-cognitivism, and the Kantian position is further confirmed by Blackburn's acknowledgment that modality is 'antinaturalistic to its core'. The position is further elaborated to show that it can accommodate the famous Kripkean categories of the empirically necessary and the contingent a priori, and finally defended against the criticisms used by Quine against Carnap.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tom Baldwin (2002). The Inaugural Address: Kantian Modality: Tom Baldwin. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):1–24.
Veit Pittioni (1987). Modality and Empirical Thinking. A Critical Discussion of the Kantian Theory of Modality. Philosophy and History 20 (2):122-123.
Ross P. Cameron (2012). Why Lewis's Analysis of Modality Succeeds in its Reductive Ambitions. Philosophers' Imprint 12 (8).
Leonard Linsky (1971). Reference and Modality. London,Oxford University Press.
Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.) (2010). Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Andrea Sauchelli (2010). Concrete Possible Worlds and Counterfactual Conditionals: Lewis Versus Williamson on Modal Knowledge. Synthese 176 (3):345-359.
Feng Ye (2009). A Naturalistic Interpretation of the Kripkean Modality. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):454-470.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2009). On the Modal Content of A Posteriori Necessities. Theoria 75 (4):344-357.
Freya Mathews (2006). Beyond Modernity and Tradition: A Third Way for Development. Ethics and the Environment 11 (2):85-113.
Fraser MacBride (ed.) (2006). Identity and Modality. Oxford University Press.
Uwe Meixner (2006). An Onto-Nomological Theory of Modality. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):47-72.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads18 ( #74,462 of 722,742 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,438 of 722,742 )
How can I increase my downloads?