The metaphysical infidelities of modern psychology
Journal of Philosophy 33 (13):337-351 (1936)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesA. E. Taylor (1928). Psychology Ancient and Modern Psychology Ancient and Modern. (Our Debt to Greece and Rome.) By G. S. Brett, M.A. Pp. Ix + 164. London, Bombay, Calcutta, Sydney: G. G. Harrap and Co., Ltd. 5s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (06):226-227.
William E. Lyons (1992). Intentionality and Modern Philosophical Psychology, III--The Appeal to Teleology. Philosophical Psychology 5 (3):309-326.
Nicholaos Jones (2008). Is Theology Respectable as Metaphysics? Zygon 43 (3):579-592.
Peter Coates (2002). Ibn 'Arabi and Modern Thought: The History of Taking Metaphysics Seriously. Anqa.
Tony Neville (1977). The Challenge of Modern Thought. University Tutorial Press.
Albert G. A. Balz (1918). Dualism and Early Modern Philosophy. II. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 15 (9):225-241.
Albert G. A. Balz (1918). Dualism and Early Modern Philosophy. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 15 (8):197-219.
Peter Groen (1935). Some Metaphysical Prepossessions of Modern Psychology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 11:90-101.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #202,056 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
