Understanding the opposition
| Abstract | Current debates about sex selection start from a paradox: on the one hand, the 'liberal' argument in favour of sex selection is often thought to be sound; but on the other hand there is widespread public opposition to sex selection. So it is worth spending some time examining the arguments against sex selection. Four different types of argument are identified: (i) religious arguments; (ii) consequentialist arguments, mainly concerning disturbance to the sex ratio; (iii) arguments to the effect that sex selection involves a failure to respect the autonomy of a child; (iv) arguments to the effect that the motivation for sex selection brings with it an instrumental attitude to children not compatible with a child's need for unconditional acceptance and love. In the end the conclusion is reached that none of these arguments provide decisive arguments against the liberal thesis that sex selection ought to be permitted, especially where 'family balancing' is envisaged. In the light of this conclusion the issue of fetal sexing followed by selective feticide as a method of sex selection C is discussed. It is argued that sex selection is not in general a good reason for abortion, but that this practice may become unstoppable. Copyright (C) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesJuliet Tizzard (2004). Sex Selection, Child Welfare and Risk: A Critique of the HFEA's Recommendations on Sex Selection. Health Care Analysis 12 (1):61-68.
Anna Mudde (2010). “Before You Formed in the Womb I Knew You”: Sex Selection and Spaces of Ambiguity. Hypatia 25 (3):553-576.
Timothy F. Murphy (2013). Getting Past Nature as a Guide to the Human Sex Ratio. Bioethics 27 (4):224-232.
Søren Holm (2004). Like a Frog in Boiling Water: The Public, the HFEA and Sex Selection. Health Care Analysis 12 (1):27-39.
David C. Geary (1998). Sexual Selection, the Division of Labor, and the Evolution of Sex Differences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):444-447.
Dennis Cooley & Irina Chesnokova (2011). Sex Selection Abortion in Kazakhstan: Understanding a Cultural Justification. Developing World Bioethics 11 (3):154-160.
S. Matthew Liao (2005). The Ethics of Using Genetic Engineering for Sex Selection. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):116-118.
S. Matthew Liao (2005). The Ethics of Using Genetic Engineering for Sex Selection. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):116-118.
Julie Zilberberg (2007). Sex Selection and Restricting Abortion and Sex Determination. Bioethics 21 (9):517–519.
Peter Frost (1998). Sex Differences May Indeed Exist for 3-D Navigational Abilities: But Was Sexual Selection Responsible? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):443-444.
M. S. Singer & A. E. Singer (1991). Justice in Preferential Hiring. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (10):797 - 803.
Myra J. Hird (2004). Sex, Gender, and Science. Palgrave Macmillan.
Stella Sandford (2010). Plato and Sex. Polity Press.
Klaus Jaffe (2000). Emergence and Maintenance of Sex Among Diploid Organisms Aided by Assortative Mating. Acta Biotheoretica 48 (2).
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2012-06-08Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
