Design, Science and Conceptual Analysis

Philosophers expend considerable effort on the analysis of concepts, but the value of such work is not widely appreciated. This paper principally analyses some arguments, beliefs, and presuppositions about the nature of design and the relations between design and science common in the literature to illustrate this point, and to contribute to the foundations of design theory.
Keywords design method  scientific method  rationality  Popper  conceptual analysis
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Greg Bamford, Design, Science and Conceptual Analysis
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Jürgen Friedrich (1996). Design Science 97. AI and Society 10 (2):199-217.
Philippe D’Anjou (2010). Toward an Horizon in Design Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):355-370.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

213 ( #5,585 of 1,725,237 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

33 ( #32,533 of 1,725,237 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.