Watkins and the Pragmatic Problem of Induction

Analysis 49 (4):203 - 205. (1989)
Abstract
Watkins proposes a neo-Popperian solution to the pragmatic problem of induction. He asserts that evidence can be used non-Inductively to prefer the principle that corroboration is more successful over all human history than that, Say, Counter-Corroboration is more successful either over this same period or in the future. Watkins's argument for rejecting the first counter-Corroborationist alternative is beside the point, However, As whatever is the best strategy over all human history is irrelevant to the pragmatic problem of induction since we are not required to act in the past, And his argument for rejecting the second presupposes induction.
Keywords induction  pragmatic problem of induction  John Watkins  Karl Popper  corroboration
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,361
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Andrew J. Swann (1988). Popper on Induction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (3):367-373.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-04-21

Total downloads

32 ( #55,286 of 1,102,699 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #46,741 of 1,102,699 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.