Research in Phenomenology 41 (3):327-357 (2012)
|Abstract||In this paper I attempt to develop several ways Merleau-Ponty's ontology might contribute to an environmental ethic through a redefinition of his concept of flesh in terms of a general theory of affectivity. Currently accepted interpretations of the concept such as those in Abram, Toadvine, Barbaras, and Dastur rely upon conceiving flesh as a perceptual experience. I contest this interpretation and argue that a more productive conception of flesh emerges when understood in terms of Heidegger's philosophy. The paper concludes with a consideration of the normative significance of flesh by examining the role of “wildness“ within a place-based ethic|
|Keywords||Merleau-Ponty Nature Relational Ontology Flesh Place|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Emmanuel Alloa (2009). La chair comme diacritique incarné. Chiasmi International 11:249-262.
Ted Toadvine (2005). Limits of the Flesh: The Role of Reflection in David Abram's Ecophenomenology. Environmental Ethics 27 (2):155-170.
Anthony J. Steinbock (1987). Merleau-Ponty's Concept of Depth. Philosophy Today 31:336-351.
Seamus Carey (2000). Cultivating Ethos Through the Body. Human Studies 23 (1):23-42.
Martín Plot (2012). Our Element: Flesh and Democracy in Merleau-Ponty. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 45 (2):235-259.
Glen Mazis (2004). Deep Ecology, The Reversibility of the Flesh of the World and the Poetic Word. Environmental Philosophy 1 (2):46-61.
David Klein-berg (1990). Justice in the Flesh. In Galen Johnson & Michael Smith (eds.), Ontology and Alterity in Merleau-Ponty. Northwestern University Press.
Rebecca Steiner Goldner (2011). Touch and Flesh in Aristotle's de Anima. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):435-446.
Véronique Fóti (2009). Chiasm, Flesh, Figuration : Toward a Non-Positive Ontology. In Robert Vallier, Wayne Jeffrey Froman & Bernard Flynn (eds.), Merleau-Ponty and the Possibilities of Philosophy: Transforming the Tradition. State University of New York Press.
Glen Mazis (2009). The Flesh of the World is Emptiness and Emptiness is the Flesh of the World, and Their Ethical Implications. In Jin Y. Park & Gereon Kopf (eds.), Merleau-Ponty and Buddhism. Lexington Books.
Carsten Allefeld (2008). What Can We Learn From Merleau-Ponty's Ontology for a Science of Consciousness? Mind and Matter 6 (2):235-255.
Hyong-hyo Kim (2009). Merleau-Pontean Flesh and its Buddhist Interpretation. In Jin Y. Park & Gereon Kopf (eds.), Merleau-Ponty and Buddhism. Lexington Books.
Glen Mazis (2009). The Flesh of the World is Emptiness and Emptiness is the Flesh of the World. In Jin and Gereon Park and Kopf (ed.), Merleau-Ponty and Buddhism. Rowman and Littlefield.
David Michael Levin (1998). Tracework: Myself and Others in the Moral Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty and Levinas. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (3):345 – 392.
Renaud Barbaras (2000). Chiasms: Merleau-Ponty's Notion of Flesh. In Fred Evans & Leonard Lawlor (eds.). State University of New York Press.
Added to index2011-10-29
Total downloads44 ( #29,724 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,779 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?