David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (3):268-279 (2007)
The focus of this paper is on E. H. Gombrich's claim that pictorial perception is a case of illusion. My aim is to point out that, on the one hand, the interpretation of this claim that is widely accepted in pictorial theory is not supported by Gombrich's analysis of pictorial perception; and, on the other hand, that the interpretation of the claim that I see as more compatible with Gombrich's analysis is not consistent with relevant facts about our relation to pictures. However, I will argue, Gombrich's elaboration of the claim of illusion is significant to the extent that it highlights important aspects of the system of pictorial representation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Alon Chasid (2014). Pictorial Experience: Not so Special After All. Philosophical Studies 171 (3):471-491.
Similar books and articles
Johan Veldeman & E. Myin (2008). Las Meninas and the Illusion of Illusionism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (9):124-130.
M. Pettersson (2011). Seeing What Is Not There: Pictorial Experience, Imagination and Non-Localization. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):279-294.
Renan Springer De Freitas & Ricardo Pietrobon (2007). Whoever Could Get Rid of the Context of Discovery/Context of Justification Dichotomy? A Proposal Based on Recent Developments in Clinical Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (1):25 – 42.
Paul Crowther (2008). Pictorial Space and the Possibility of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):175-192.
Flint Schier (1986). Deeper Into Pictures: An Essay on Pictorial Representation. Cambridge University Press.
Gavin McIntosh (2003). Depiction Unexplained: Peacocke and Hopkins on Pictorial Representation. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3):279-288.
Bence Nanay (2005). Is Twofoldness Necessary for Representational Seeing? British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):248-257.
John Hyman (2003). Subjectivism in the Theory of Pictorial Art. The Monist 86 (4):676 - 701.
Dominic Lopes (1995). Pictorial Realism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (3):277-285.
Mark Rollins (1999). Pictorial Representation: When Cognitive Science Meets Aesthetics. Philosophical Psychology 12 (4):387 – 413.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads78 ( #25,890 of 1,696,639 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #144,292 of 1,696,639 )
How can I increase my downloads?