The ontological function of first-order and second-order corpuscles in the chemical philosophy of Robert Boyle: the redintegration of potassium nitrate [Book Review]
Foundations of Chemistry 14 (3):221-234 (2012)
|Abstract||Although Boyle has been regarded as a champion of the seventeenth century Cartesian mechanical philosophy, I defend the position that Boyle’s views conciliate between a strictly mechanistic conception of fundamental matter and a non-reductionist conception of chemical qualities. In particular, I argue that this conciliation is evident in Boyle’s ontological distinction between fundamental corpuscles endowed with mechanistic properties and higher-level corpuscular concretions endowed with chemical properties. Some of these points have already been acknowledged by contemporary scholars, and I actively engage with their ideas in this paper. However I attempt to contribute to the debate over Boyle’s mechanical philosophy by arguing that Boyle’s writings suggest an emergentist, albeit still mechanistic, notion of chemical properties. I contrast Boyle’s views against those of strict reductionist mechanical philosophers, focusing on the famous debate with Spinoza over the redintegration of niter, and argue that Boyle’s complex chemical ontology provides a more satisfactory understanding of chemical phenomena than is provided by a strictly reductionist and Cartesian mechanical philosophy|
|Keywords||Boyle Spinoza Corpuscularism Mechanism Reductionism Emergentism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marina Paola Banchetti-Robino, Ontological Tensions in 16th and 17th Century Chemistry: Between Mechanism and Vitalism.
Marina Paola Banchetti-Robino (2011). Ontological Tensions in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Chemistry: Between Mechanism and Vitalism. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 13 (3):173-186.
Simon B. Duffy (2006). The Difference Between Science and Philosophy: The Spinoza-Boyle Controversy Revisited. Paragraph 29 (2):115-138.
Robert Trueman (2012). Neutralism Within the Semantic Tradition. Thought 1 (3):246-251.
I. I. Wolf (1997). Locke, Boyle, and the Percieving of Corpuscles. Southwest Philosophy Review 13 (2).
David F. Wolf Ii (1997). Locke, Boyle, and the Percieving of Corpuscles. Southwest Philosophy Review 13 (2):43-56.
Jan W. Wojcik (1997). Robert Boyle and the Limits of Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Ezra Talmor (1988). Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscles. Locke and Boyle on the External World. Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (1):152-153.
R. P. (2002). Boyle on Seminal Principles. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (4):597-630.
Graham Oppy (2008). Higher-Order Ontological Arguments. Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1066-1078.
G. A. J. Rogers (1988). Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscles: Locke and Boyle on the External World By Peter Alexander Cambridge University Press, 1985, Ix + 336 Pp., £32.50. [REVIEW] Philosophy 63 (246):548-.
Robert Grafstein (1983). The Ontological Foundation of Nozick's View of Politics: Robert's Rules of Order. Philosophical Studies 44 (3):401 - 424.
Stéphanie Ruphy (2006). Ontology Relativized: Reply to Moulines. Synthese 151 (3):325 - 330.
J. J. MacIntosh (2005). Robert Boyle (1627-1691); the Philosophy of Robert Boyle: Scrupulosity and Science. Dialogue 44 (1):167-169.
Added to index2012-07-24
Total downloads6 ( #154,724 of 722,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,863 )
How can I increase my downloads?