Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- J. A. Barnes (1959). Anthropology After Freud. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):14 – 27.
Similar books and articles
This unique book applies concepts from the field of anthropology to clinical settings to result in a powerful and dynamic model/theory of clinical anthropology.
On the back cover of the original French edition of Sartre's Le scénario Freud (The Freud Scenario), the promotional blurb poses the question: "Est-ce ici Sartre qui analyse Freud ou Freud qui analyse Sartre?" (Is Sartre analyzing Freud here, or is Freud analyzing Sartre?). We do not, for obvious reasons, have anything of Freud's on Sartre, but we do have quite a lot of Sartre on Freud, and great quantities of Sartre on Sartre. It has sometimes seemed to me that reading through everything that Sartre wrote—not just the autobiographical material but everything, including the carnets and the cahiers and the letters—might be a bit like having him in analysis. The speed and apparent openness with which he produced his texts, page after page in that quick yet legible script that French writers seem to turn out so effortlessly, mimic some of the conditions of free association, and an analytically sensitive eye, like the analyst's ear in therapeutic sessions, could no doubt piece together a plausible account of the Sartrean unconscious.
This paper argues that Hitchcock's so-called 'Freudian' films (esp. Spellbound, Psycho, and Marnie) pay tribute to the cultural magnetism of Freud's ideas whist being critical of the tehories themselves.
The Interpretation of Dreams is often thought to be Freud's best book-length work. It was, indeed, Freud's first lengthy statement of a substantially original psychological theory. Freud wrote the book in the late 1890's and published it in 1900; it had a second edition in 1909, and thereafter many subsequent editions. By Freud's own account it was not well received by the scientific..
The Other Freud undertakes an exciting and original analysis of Freud's major writings on religion and culture. James DiCenso suggests that Freud's texts on religion are unjustifiably ignored or taken for granted, and he shows that Freud's commentary on religion are rich, multifaceted texts, and deserve far more attention. Using concepts derived primarily from Jacques Lacan and Julia Kristeva, DiCenso draws an unparalleled critical portrait of the "other Freud". This book is rich with new ideas and fresh interpretations.
O autor esboça um quadro configurativo das linhas-mestras do pensamento pedagógico de Freud, bem como da antropologia onde se inscreve. Defende que as reflexões pedagógicas freudianas desenham o perfil duma concepção agónica da educação, marcada pelo propósito de nos colocar diante dos aspectos trágicos da educação. /// L'auteur esquisse le cadre des lignes maîtresses de la pensée pédagogique de Freud ainsi que de l'anthropologie oú elle s'inscrit. Il soutient que les réflexions pédagogiques freudiennes dessinent une conception agonique de l'éducation, conception oú se marque le propos de nous confronter aux aspects tragiques de l'éducation. /// The author sketches what can be considered the key concepts of Freud's thought concerning aducation; this thought implies a certain anthropology. Freud's reflection on education is agonic and implies tragic aspects.
No categories
This essay presents imaginary philosophical debates between Heidegger and Freud exploring their views on science, philosophy, their interrelationship and the fundamental philosophical presuppositions of Freud’s metapsychology. In the final section, Heidegger presents a series of criticisms of Freud’s theory, to which ‘Freud’ posthumously responds.
Discussion of J. A. Barnes, Anthropology after Freud
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

