Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):344-347 (2008)
|Abstract||Objective: To assess the adequacy of the process of informed consent for surgical patients at the University Hospital of the West Indies. Method: The study is a prospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study. 210 patients at the University Hospital of the West Indies were interviewed using a standardised investigator-administered questionnaire, developed by the authors, after obtaining witnessed, informed consent for participation in the study. Data were analysed using SPSS V.12 for Windows. Results: Of the patients, 39.4% were male. Of the surgical procedures, 68.6% were scheduled, 7.6% urgent and 23.8% emergency, 35.2% were minor and 64.8% major. Information imparted/received was acceptable in 40% of cases, good in 24% and inadequate (unacceptable) in 36% of cases. Almost all (97.6%) patients stated that they understood why an operation was planned and 93.3% thought that they had given informed consent. Most (95.2%) thought that they had free choice and made up their own mind. A quarter (25.2%) of all patients were told that it was mandatory for them to sign the form. There was a discussion of possible side effects and complications in 56.7% of patients. Conclusions: This study clearly indicates that surgical patients at the University Hospital of the West Indies feel that they have given informed consent. However, it also suggests that more information should be given to patients for consent to be truly informed|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Janet L. Brody, John P. Cluck & Alfredo S. Aragon (1997). Participants' Understanding of the Process of Psychological Research: Informed Consent. Ethics and Behavior 7 (4):285 – 298.
Deborah Bowman (2011). Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Leonard J. Haas (1991). Hide-and-Seek or Show-and-Tell? Emerging Issues of Informed Consent. Ethics and Behavior 1 (3):175 – 189.
Miles Little (2009). The Role of Regret in Informed Consent. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):49-59.
Rosalind Ekman Ladd (1989). Women in Labor: Some Issues About Informed Consent. Hypatia 4 (3):37 - 45.
Martin Gunderson, David J. Mayo & Frank S. Rhame (1996). Routine HIV Testing of Hospital Patients and Pregnant Women: Informed Consent in the Real World. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):161-182.
Shaun D. Pattinson (2009). Consent and Informational Responsibility. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):176-179.
David Shaw (2009). Prescribing Placebos Ethically: The Appeal of Negatively Informed Consent. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (2):97-99.
Sheila McLean (2010). Autonomy, Consent and the Law. Routledge-Cavendish.
Leslie Cannold (1997). "There Is No Evidence to Suggest...": Changing the Way We Judge Information for Disclosure in the Informed Consent Process. Hypatia 12 (2):165 - 184.
Jukka Varelius (2010). On Taylor's Justification of Medical Informed Consent. Bioethics 26 (4):207-214.
Benedetto Vitiello (2008). Effectively Obtaining Informed Consent for Child and Adolescent Participation in Mental Health Research. Ethics and Behavior 18 (2 & 3):182 – 198.
Sven Ove Hansson (2006). Informed Consent Out of Context. Journal of Business Ethics 63 (2):149 - 154.
James R. P. Ogloff & Randy K. Otto (1991). Are Research Participants Truly Informed? Readability of Informed Consent Forms Used in Research. Ethics and Behavior 1 (4):239 – 252.
Neil C. Manson (2007). Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. Cambridge University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-13
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?