Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Were Maxwell and Boltzmann irrational to develop statistical mechanics whereas it was empirically refuted by the specific heats problem? My analysis of this historical episode departs from the current proposals about belief change. I first give a detailed description of Maxwell's and Boltzmann's epistemic states in the years they were working on statistical mechanics and then make some methodological proposals in epistemology that would account for the complexity of this case.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Henk W. Regt (2005). Scientific Realism in Action: Molecular Models and Boltzmann's Bildtheorie. Erkenntnis 63 (2):205 - 230.
Orly Shenker & Meir Hemmo (2011). Maxwell's Demon. Journal of Philosophy 107 (8):389-411.
Stephen Leeds (2003). Foundations of Statistical Mechanics—Two Approaches. Philosophy of Science 70 (1):126-144.
D. Costantini & U. Garibaldi (1997). A Probabilistic Foundation of Elementary Particle Statistics. Part I. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 28 (4):483-506.
Carolyn Price (2010). The Rationality of Grief. Inquiry 53 (1):20-40.
Orly R. Shenker & Meir Hemmo, Prediction and Retrodiction in Boltzmann's Approach to Classical Statistical Mechanics.
Donald Davidson (1985). Incoherence and Irrationality. Dialectica 39 (4):345-54.
David Lavis (2008). Boltzmann, Gibbs, and the Concept of Equilibrium. Philosophy of Science 75 (5):682-696.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #71,234 of 729,711 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 729,711 )
How can I increase my downloads?