Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Nikos K. Logothetis University of Manchester, Manchester, UK In binocular rivalry, the visual percept alternates stochastically between two dichoptically presented stimuli. It is established that both processes related to the eye of origin and binocular, stimulus-related processes account for these ﬂuctuations in conscious perception. Here we studied how their relative contributions vary over time. We applied brief disruptions to rivalry displays, concurrent with an optional eye swap, at varying time intervals after one stimulus became visible (dominant). We found that early in a dominance phase the dominant eye determined the percept by stabilizing its own contribution (regardless of the stimulus), with an additional yet weaker stabilizing contribution of the stimulus (regardless of the eye). Their stabilizing contributions declined in parallel with time so that late in a dominance phase the stimulus (and in some cases also the eye-based) contribution turned negative, favoring a perceptual (or ocular) switch. Our ﬁndings show that depending on the time, ﬁrst processes related to the eye of origin and then those related to the stimulus can have a greater net inﬂuence on the stability of the conscious percept. Their co-varying change may be due to feedback from image- to eyeof-origin representations.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
R. R. Blake (2001). A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies. Brain and Mind 2 (1):5-38.
Frank Sengpiel, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Tobe C. B. Freeman & Colin Blakemore (2001). On the Relationship Between Interocular Suppression in the Primary Visual Cortex and Binocular Rivalry. Brain and Mind 2 (1):39-54.
Tobias Bonhoeffer Frank Sengpiel, C. B. Freeman Tobe & Colin Blakemore (2001). On the Relationship Between Interocular Suppression in the Primary Visual Cortex and Binocular Rivalry. Brain and Mind 2 (1).
K. Moutoussis, G. A. Keliris, Z. Kourtzi & N. K. Logothetis (2005). A Binocular Rivalry Study of Motion Perception in the Human Brain. Vision Research 45 (17):2231-43.
Fumihiko Taya & Ken Mogi (2005). Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of the Visual System Revealed in Binocular Rivalry. Neuroscience Letters 381 (1-2):63-68.
Ryota Kanai, Farshad Moradi, Shinsuke Shimojo & Frans A. J. Verstraten (2005). Perceptual Alternation Induced by Visual Transients. Perception 34 (7):803-822.
Randolph Blake & Chai-Youn Kim (2005). Psychophysical Strategies for Rendering the Normally Visible Invisible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (8):381-388.
Irvin Rock (1982). Inference in Perception. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:525 - 540.
Frank Tong (2001). Competing Theories of Binocular Rivalry: A Possible Resolution. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 2 (1):55-83.
J. D. Haynes, R. Deichmann & G. Rees (2005). Eye-Specific Effects of Binocular Rivalry in the Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus. Nature 438 (7069):496-9.
E. D. Lumer (2000). Binocular Rivalry and Human Visual Awareness. In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Neural Correlates of Consciousness. MIT Press.
S. M. Miller (2001). Binocular Rivalry and the Cerebral Hemispheres, with a Note on the Correlates and Constitution of Visual Consciousness. Brain and Mind 2 (1):119-49.
John D. Pettigrew (2001). Searching for the Switch: Neural Bases for Perceptual Rivalry Alternations. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 2 (1):85-118.
Naotsugu Tsuchiya & Christof Koch (2005). Continuous Flash Suppression Reduces Negative Afterimages. Nature Neuroscience 8 (8):1096-1101.
Robert P. O'Shea & Paul M. Corballis (2001). Binocular Rivalry Between Complex Stimuli in Split-Brain Observers. Brain and Mind 2 (1):151-160.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads4 ( #189,051 of 739,317 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,317 )
How can I increase my downloads?