Countable additivity and the de finetti lottery
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):301-321 (2004)
| Abstract | De Finetti would claim that we can make sense of a draw in which each positive integer has equal probability of winning. This requires a uniform probability distribution over the natural numbers, violating countable additivity. Countable additivity thus appears not to be a fundamental constraint on subjective probability. It does, however, seem mandated by Dutch Book arguments similar to those that support the other axioms of the probability calculus as compulsory for subjective interpretations. These two lines of reasoning can be reconciled through a slight generalization of the Dutch Book framework. Countable additivity may indeed be abandoned for de Finetti's lottery, but this poses no serious threat to its adoption in most applications of subjective probability. Introduction The de Finetti lottery Two objections to equiprobability 3.1 The ‘No random mechanism’ argument 3.2 The Dutch Book argument Equiprobability and relative betting quotients The re-labelling paradox 5.1 The paradox 5.2 Resolution: from symmetry to relative probability Beyond the de Finetti lottery. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Dutch Book arguments countable additivity indifference principle | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
  |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert F. Nau (2001). De Finetti Was Right: Probability Does Not Exist. Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):89-124.
Jan von Plato (1989). De Finetti's Earliest Works on the Foundations of Probability. Erkenntnis 31 (2-3):263 - 282.
Cory Juhl & Kevin T. Kelly (1994). Realism, Convergence, and Additivity. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:181 - 189.
Colin Howson (2007). Logic with Numbers. Synthese 156 (3):491-512.
Vieri Benci, Leon Horsten & Sylvia Wenmackers (forthcoming). Non-Archimedean Probability. Milan Journal of Mathematics.
Jacob Ross (2012). All Roads Lead to Violations of Countable Additivity. Philosophical Studies 161 (3):381-390.
Teddy Seidenfeld & Mark J. Schervish (1983). A Conflict Between Finite Additivity and Avoiding Dutch Book. Philosophy of Science 50 (3):398-412.
Colin Howson (2008). De Finetti, Countable Additivity, Consistency and Coherence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (1):1-23.
J. Williamson (1999). Countable Additivity and Subjective Probability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (3):401-416.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads39 ( #29,888 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #8,982 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
