Graduate studies at Western
Synthese 83 (2):317 - 323 (1990)
|Abstract||I argue that Copernicus accepted the reality of celestial spheres on the grounds that the equant problem is unintelligible except as a problem about real spheres. The same considerations point to a number of generally unnoticed liabilities of Copernican astronomy, especially gaps between the spheres, and the failure of some spheres to obey the principle that their natural motion is to rotate. These difficulties may be additional reasons for Copernicus's reluctance to publish, and also stand in the way of strict realism as applied to De Revolutionibus, although a realistic astronomy may be envisioned as a goal for Copernicus's research program.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Carlos Solís (2001). Los Cometas Contra Copérnico: Brahe, Galileo Y Los Jesuitas (Comets Against Copernicus: Brahe, Galileo, and the Jesuits). Theoria 16 (2):353-385.
Neil Thomason (1992). Could Lakatos, Even with Zahar's Criterion for Novel Fact, Evaluate the Copernican Research Programme? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (2):161-200.
Michael H. Shank (2002). Regiomontanus on Ptolemy, Physical Orbs, and Astronomical Fictionalism: Goldsteinian Themes in the "Defense of Theon Against George of Trebizond". Perspectives on Science 10 (2):179-207.
Damien Janos (2011). Moving the Orbs: Astronomy, Physics, and Metaphysics, and the Problem of Celestial Motion According to Ibn Sīnā. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 21 (02):165-214.
Carlos Minguez (1995). Sobre El Valor de Las Matemáticas: Juan Luis Vives Y El Prefacio de Osiander. Theoria 10 (2):155-173.
A. D. Ritchie (1944). Copernicus. By Sir Harold Spencer Jones, F.R.S. (University of Wales Press. 1943. Pp. 30. Price 1s. 6d.)From Copernicus to Einstein. By Hans Reichenbach. Translated by Ralph B. Winn. (New York: Philosophical Library, Inc. 1942. Pp. 123. Price $2.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 19 (73):174-.
Peter Barker (2002). Constructing Copernicus. Perspectives on Science 10 (2):208-227.
Robert I. Griffiths (1988). Was There a Crisis Before the Copernican Revolution? A Reappraisal of Gingerich's Criticisms of Kuhn. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:127 - 132.
Peter Barker & Bernard R. Goldstein (1998). Realism and Instrumentalism in Sixteenth Century Astronomy: A Reappraisal. Perspectives on Science 6 (3):232-258.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,769 of 751,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?