Deflated Concepts: A Reply to Stainton
Crítica 29 (86):83 - 105 (1997)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert J. Stainton (2000). Objects and Senses and Substitutions: A Reply to Dwyer. Dialogue 39 (03):593-.
Robert J. Stainton (2003). Speaker Meaning and Davidson on Metaphor: A Reply to McGuire. Dialogue 42 (02):345-.
John Michael McGuire (2003). Davidson on Metaphorical Meaning: A Reply to Stainton. Dialogue 42 (02):355-.
Robert J. Stainton & Christopher Viger (2000). Jerry A. Fodor, Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Synthese 123 (1):131-151.
Craig Hanson (2008). Hyperbolic Discounting, Selfhood and Irrationality. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 22:71-78.
Georges Rey (2004). A Deflated Intentionalist Alternative to Clark's Unexplanatory Metaphysics. Philosophical Psychology 17 (4):519-540.
Martin M. Tweedale (2004). Future Contingents and Deflated Truthvalue Gaps. Noûs 38 (2):233–265.
Edouard Machery (2006). How to Split Concepts: A Reply to Piccinini and Scott. Philosophy of Science 73 (4):410-418.
Eric Mandelbaum (forthcoming). Against Alief. Philosophical Studies.
Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Concepts. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Adam Kovach (1997). Stretching the Truth: Inflated Claims About Deflated Truth and Reference. Philosophical Issues 8:127-137.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-05-29Total downloads1 ( #274,921 of 549,106 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,106 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
