Graduate studies at Western
Theoria 21 (55):7-19 (2006)
|Abstract||The aim of this paper is to defend the structural concept of representation, as defined by homomorphisms, against its main objections, namely: logical objections, the objection from misrepresentation, theobjection from failing necessity, and the copy theory objection. The logical objections can be met by reserving the relation|
|Keywords||Content Homomorphism Representation Science Structure Target|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gabriele Contessa (2007). Scientific Representation, Interpretation, and Surrogative Reasoning. Philosophy of Science 74 (1):48-68.
Chris Swoyer (1991). Structural Representation and Surrogative Reasoning. Synthese 87 (3):449 - 508.
Adrian J. T. Smith (2009). Acting on (Bodily) Experience. Psyche 15 (1):82 - 99.
Robert C. Cummins (1992). Conceptual Role Semantics and the Explanatory Role of Content. Philosophical Studies 65 (1-2):103-127.
Hsiang‐Ke Chao (2007). A Structure of the Consumption Function. Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (2):227-248.
Robert C. Cummins (2002). Haugeland on Representation and Intentionality. In Hugh Clapin (ed.), Philosophy of Mental Representation. Oxford University Press.
H. Lindahl (2000). Authority and Representation. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):223-246.
Tomer Fekete (2010). Representational Systems. Minds and Machines 20 (1):69-101.
Gabriele Contessa (2007). Representing Reality: The Ontology of Scientific Models and Their Representational Function. Dissertation, University of London
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #31,924 of 751,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,997 of 751,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?