Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):98-99 (2004)
|Abstract||By focusing primarily on communication between adult and child and on adult-set criteria for appropriate action, Carpendale & Lewis's (C&L's) account of the development of social understanding in the epistemic triangle tends toward an enculturation view, while diminishing the role of individuals. What their proposed mechanism fails to acknowledge is that the two agents in the epistemic triangle necessarily have independent perspectives of the object and of each other.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Suzanne Hala (2004). The Role of Executive Function in Constructing an Understanding of Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):108-109.
Kristin Shrader-Frechette (1995). Environmental Risk and the Iron Triangle: The Case of Yucca Mountain. Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (4):753-777.
Jeremy I. M. Carpendale & Charlie Lewis (2004). Constructing Understanding, with Feeling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):130-141.
Alexander S. Kechris (1981). Forcing with \Triangle Perfect Trees and Minimal \Triangle-Degrees. Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (4):803-816.
Leslie Smith (2004). Acts of Judgment, Not Epistemic Triangles. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):122-123.
Elizabeth Meins (2004). Infants' Minds, Mothers' Minds, and Other Minds: How Individual Differences in Caregivers Affect the Co-Construction of Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):116-116.
Armando Machado, Orlando Lourenço & Francisco J. Silva (2000). Facts, Concepts, and Theories: The Shape of Psychology's Epistemic Triangle. Behavior and Philosophy 28 (1/2):1 - 40.
Charles Fernyhough (2004). More Than a Context for Learning? The Epistemic Triangle and the Dialogic Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):104-105.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #212,976 of 722,699 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?