Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (2):127-132 (2002)
|Abstract||Connections among Varela's theory of enactive cognition , his evolutionary theory of natural drift, and his concept of autopoiesis are made clear. Two questions are posed in relation to Varela's conception of perception, and the tension that exists in his thought between the formal level of organization and the Jonasian notion of the organism.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michel Bitbol (2002). Science as If Situation Mattered. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (2):181-224.
Francisco Varela & Humberto Maturana (1972). Mechanism and Biological Explanation. Philosophy of Science 39 (3):378-382.
Renaud Barbaras (2006). Desire and Distance: Introduction to a Phenomenology of Perception. Stanford University Press.
Francisco Varela (1994). A Cognitive View of the Immune System. World Futures 42 (1):31-40.
Evan Thompson & Francisco J. Varela (1999). Autopoiesis and Lifelines: The Importance of Origins. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):909-910.
Francisco J. Varela & Bernhard Poerksen (2006). Truth is What Works : Francisco J. Varela on Cognitive Science, Buddhism, the Inseparability of Subject and Object, and the Exaggerations of Constructivism--A Conversation. Journal of Aesthetic Education 40 (1).
John Protevi, Beyond Autopoiesis: Inflections of Emergence and Politics in the Work of Francisco Varela.
Evan Thompson (2004). Life and Mind: From Autopoiesis to Neurophenomenology. A Tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):381-398.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads77 ( #10,404 of 549,754 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )
How can I increase my downloads?