Is Philosophy Possible? A Study of Logical Positivism

Philosophy 22 (81):25-48 (1947)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The present situation in philosophy is paradoxical. On the one hand, thinking men and women all over the world are exclaiming that, while science has made sufficient advance to satisfy all our material needs, what we most need, and must find if we are not to suffer shipwreck, is a new sense of values, a new religious awakening and a new orientation towards life, in short a new philosophy. On the other hand, many professional philosophers are coming to hold the view that philosophy has had its day, or rather that it never in any proper sense had its day, because it is not a rational enterprise but a mistake, an illusion, a farrago of nonsense, “a muddle arising out of the complexities of language.” A new inquiry which goes by the name of Analysis and resembles logic more closely than any other existing discipline is at once to give the quietus to philosophy and to reign in its stead. The modern philosopher cries, with Faustus, “Sweet Analytickes! 'tis thou hast ravished me.” I will not prejudice your minds at the outset by recalling where the study of analysis led the Doctor of Wurtemburg.Those who are thus forthrightly sceptical about philosophy and group themselves under the aegis of analysis are themselves divided into a number of sects. One and all, however, are relentless in exposing the weaknesses of philosophy, zealous in proselytizing and deadly in expounding their new technique which combines scholastic subtlety with modern scientific realism. They represent in fact a modern scholasticism loosely grouped round the dogma: “We pursue logical analysis, but not philosophy,” though, by a curious paradox which demands scrutiny, some of them say: “Philosophy is analysis.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Several Issues on Study of the History of China Logic.Jin-Cheng Zhai - 2007 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 4:36-45.
Wigan Stearns logical analysis.Funing Ding - 1997 - Philosophy and Culture 24 (6/7):555-577.
Philosophy or Religion?Hiroshi Marui - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 6:195-209.
Bertrand Russell and logical truth.Matthew Mckeon - 1999 - Philosophia 27 (3-4):541-553.
Philosophy of science in iran.Ali Akbar Navabi - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (1):75 – 89.
Philosophy of Language.Martin Davies - unknown - In Nicholas Bunnin & E. P. Tsui‐James (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 90–146.
Analytical Philosophy Today.V. A. Lektorskii - 1971 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 10 (2):135-157.
Literature, truth and logic.Martin Warner - 1999 - Philosophy 74 (1):29-54.
A Rudimentary Probe Into Taiwan's Neo-scholasicism.Qi-Shui Wang - 2000 - Philosophy and Culture 27 (3):270-282.
On Yuelin Jin's Contribution to the Study of Logic.Guoping Du & Li Zhang - 2000 - Philosophy and Culture 27 (7):676-682.
Analysis.Michael Beaney - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
16 (#774,541)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references