Joseph Bingham, the French reformed church and the comprehension question
Heythrop Journal 27 (3):249–261 (1986)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAlvin Plantinga (1982). Reformed Epistemology Again. Reformed Journal 32 (July):7-8.
Alvin Plantinga (1982). On Reformed Epistemology. Reformed Journal 32 (January):13-17.
Joseph S. Pettit (1996). Toward a Reformed Pragmatism. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 17 (2):167-183.
David Basinger (1988). Hick's Religious Pluralism and “Reformed Epistemology”. Faith and Philosophy 5 (4):421-432.
Pierluigi Minari (1999). Theories of Types and Names with Positive Stratified Comprehension. Studia Logica 62 (2):215-242.
John Beversluis (1995). Reforming the “Reformed” Objection to Natural Theology. Faith and Philosophy 12 (2):189-206.
Joseph W. Bingham (1966). Are There Legal Rules? In Martin P. Golding (ed.), The Nature of Law. New York, Random House.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
