David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This Article uses public choice theory and the new institutionalism to discuss the incentives, proclivities, and shared backgrounds of lawyers and judges. In America every law-making judge has a single unifying characteristic, each is a former lawyer. This shared background has powerful and unexplored effects on the shape and structure of American law. This Article argues that the shared characteristics, thought-processes, training, and incentives of Judges and lawyers lead inexorably to greater complexity in judge-made law. These same factors lead to the following prediction: judge-created law will be most complex in areas where a) elite lawyers regularly practice; b) judges may have a personal preference in the case that can be written-around by way of legal complexity; and c) the subject area interests the judge, or is generally considered prestigious. The Article uses the law of standing as a case study.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Brian Bix (2010). Law and Language: How Words Mislead Us. Jurisprudence 1 (1):25-38.
Michal Bobek, On the Application of European Law in (Not Only) the Courts of the New Member States: 'Don't Do as I Say'?
Bruce A. Green & Russell G. Pearce, 'Public Service Must Begin at Home': The Lawyer as Civics Teacher in Everyday Practice.
Neil MacCormick (2005). Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Oxford University Press.
Elisabetta Iossa & Bruno Jullien, The Market for Lawyers: The Value of Information on the Quality of Legal Services.
Juan Javier Granaddelo & M. C. Mirow, The Future of the Economic Analysis of Law in Latin America: A Proposal for Alacde Model Law and Economics Civil and Commercial Codes.
Geoffrey C. Hazard (2004). Legal Ethics: A Comparative Study. Stanford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #370,781 of 1,696,615 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,146 of 1,696,615 )
How can I increase my downloads?