James' “The Will To Believe”

In “The Will to Believe,” William James affirms that we have some control over what we believe and asks how this control should be exercised. He rejects the evidentialists’ view that we ought to believe only when intellectual grounds make it quite sure that the belief is true. For him, “options” are choices among contrary beliefs. Some options are “living,” “forced,” and “momentous.” James’ thesis concerns belief-options that have these three features and where proof as to the truth is unavailable. He holds that in such cases we have a right to believe, provided believing has better consequences than not believing would. James is correct that sometimes it is permissible to believe without adequate grounds. His view is misleading, though, when he leaves the impression that this is so only where the option is living, forced, momentous, and not settleable by evidence. The right to believe has broader scope than this. Moreover, James’ right to believe presupposes a view of truth at odds with his later pragmatism
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,037
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Richard M. Gale (1999). William James and the Willfulness of Belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):71-91.
Michael Lopresto (2011). The Ethics of Belief. Emergent Australasian Philosophers (4):9.
Richard M. Gale (1999). William James and the Willfulness of Belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):71 - 91.
Max Carl Otto (ed.) (1942). William James. Madison, the University of Wisconsin Press.
William James (1895). Is Life Worth Living? International Journal of Ethics 6 (1):1-24.
Henry Jackman (1998). James' Pragmatic Account of Intentionality and Truth. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34 (1):155-181.
Celal Türer (2006). The Challenge of William James's Philosophy of Religion. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:25-30.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

20 ( #197,288 of 1,934,421 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #434,207 of 1,934,421 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.