David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:69-76 (1999)
In “The Will to Believe,” William James affirms that we have some control over what we believe and asks how this control should be exercised. He rejects the evidentialists’ view that we ought to believe only when intellectual grounds make it quite sure that the belief is true. For him, “options” are choices among contrary beliefs. Some options are “living,” “forced,” and “momentous.” James’ thesis concerns belief-options that have these three features and where proof as to the truth is unavailable. He holds that in such cases we have a right to believe, provided believing has better consequences than not believing would. James is correct that sometimes it is permissible to believe without adequate grounds. His view is misleading, though, when he leaves the impression that this is so only where the option is living, forced, momentous, and not settleable by evidence. The right to believe has broader scope than this. Moreover, James’ right to believe presupposes a view of truth at odds with his later pragmatism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard Feldman (2006). Clifford's Principle and James's Options. Social Epistemology 20 (1):19 – 33.
Richard M. Gale (1999). William James and the Willfulness of Belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):71-91.
Michael Lopresto (2011). The Ethics of Belief. Emergent Australasian Philosophers (4):9.
Bertrand Russell (1992). William James's Conception of Truth. In William James & Doris Olin (eds.), William James: Pragmatism, in Focus. Routledge
Richard M. Gale (1999). William James and the Willfulness of Belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):71 - 91.
Jennifer Welchman (2006). William James's "the Will to Believe" and the Ethics of Self-Experimentation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (2):229-241.
Robert J. O'Connell (1997). William James on the Courage to Believe. Fordham University Press.
Max Carl Otto (ed.) (1942). William James. Madison, the University of Wisconsin Press.
William James (1895). Is Life Worth Living? International Journal of Ethics 6 (1):1-24.
José M. Medina (2009). James on Truth and Solidarity : The Epistemology of Diversity and the Politics of Specificity. In John J. Stuhr (ed.), 100 Years of Pragmatism: William James's Revolutionary Philosophy. Indiana University Press
Henry Jackman (1998). James' Pragmatic Account of Intentionality and Truth. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34 (1):155-181.
Michael R. Slater (2009). William James on Ethics and Faith. Cambridge University Press.
Ludwig F. Schlecht (1997). Re-Reading ‘the Will to Believe’. Religious Studies 33 (2):217-225.
Celal Türer (2006). The Challenge of William James's Philosophy of Religion. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:25-30.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads20 ( #187,758 of 1,907,219 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #109,150 of 1,907,219 )
How can I increase my downloads?