Law and Philosophy 31 (1):1-48 (2012)
|Abstract||The rapid recent expansion of copyright law worldwide has sparked efforts to defend the ‘public domain’ of non-propertized information, often on the ground that an expansive public domain is a condition of a ‘free culture’. Yet questions remain about why the public domain is worth defending, what exactly a free culture is, and what role (if any) authors’ rights might play in relation to it. From the standard liberal perspective shared by many critics of copyright expansionism, the protection of individual expression by means of marketable property rights in authors’ works serves as an engine of progress towards a fully competitive ‘marketplace of ideas’ – though only if balanced by an extensive public domain from which users may draw in the exercise of their own expressivity. This article shows that a significantly different, and arguably richer, conception of what a free culture is and how authors’ rights underpin it emerges from a direct engagement with the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. For Kant, progress towards a fully emancipated (i.e. a ‘mature’ or ‘enlightened’) culture can only be achieved through the critical intellectual activity that public communication demands: individual expressive freedom is only a condition, not constitutive, of this ‘freedom to make public use of one’s reason in all matters’. The main thesis defended in this article is that when Kant’s writings on publicity (critical public debate) are read in relation to his writings on the legal organization of publishing, a necessary connection emerges between authors’ rights – as distinct from copyrights – and what Jürgen Habermas and others have named the public sphere. I conclude that it is the public sphere, and not the public domain as such, that should serve as the key reference point in any evaluation of copyright law’s role in relation to the possibility of a free culture|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Maria Chiara Pievatolo, The Pirate From Koenigsberg: Why Closed Source Software is Not Worth of Copyright Protection.
Jonathan Peterson (2008). Enlightenment and Freedom. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 223-244.
Hugh Breakey (2010). User's Rights and the Public Domain. Intellectual Property Quarterly (3):312-23.
Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, The Author as Steward 'for Limited Times': A Review of 'the Idea of Authorship in Copyright'. [REVIEW]
Hugh Breakey (2010). Natural Intellectual Property Rights and the Public Domain. Modern Law Review 73 (2):208-239.
Deven R. Desai, Copyright's Hidden Assumption: A Critical Analysis of the Foundations of Descendible Copyright.
Tomas Lipinski & Elizabeth Buchanan (2006). The Impact of Copyright Law and Other Ownership Mechanisms on the Freedom of Inquiry: Infringements on the Public Domain. Journal of Information Ethics 15 (1):47-59.
James Mensch (2007). Public Space. Continental Philosophy Review 40 (1):31-47.
Slavko Splichal (2003). Bentham, Kant, and the Right to Communicate. Critical Review 15 (3-4):285-305.
Agnes S. Ku (2000). Revisiting the Notion of "Public" in Habermas's Theory-Toward a Theory of Politics of Public Credibility. Sociological Theory 18 (2):216-240.
William T. Gallagher, Strategic Intellectual Property Litigation, the Right of Publicity, and the Attenuation of Free Speech: Lessons From the Schwarzenegger Bobblehead Doll War (and Peace).
Added to index2011-07-02
Total downloads67 ( #13,279 of 549,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?