Medical diagnostic reasoning: Epistemological modeling as a strategy for design of computer-based consultation programs

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (1) (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The complexity of cognitive emulation of human diagnostic reasoning is the major challenge in the implementation of computer-based programs for diagnostic advice in medicine. We here present an epistemological model of diagnosis with the ultimate goal of defining a high-level language for cognitive and computational primitives. The diagnostic task proceeds through three different phases: hypotheses generation, hypotheses testing and hypotheses closure. Hypotheses generation has the inferential form of abduction (from findings to hypotheses) constrained under the criterion of plausibility. Hypotheses testing is achieved by a deductive inference (from generated hypotheses to expected findings), followed by an eliminative induction, constrained under the criterion of covering, which matches expected findings against patient''s findings to select the best explanation. Hypotheses closure is a deductive-inductive type of inference very similar to the inferences operating in hypotheses testing. In this case induction matches the consequences of the generated hypotheses against the patient''s characteristics or preferences under the criterion of utility. By using the language exploited in this epistemological model, it is possible to describe the cognitive tasks underlying the most influential knowledge-based diagnostic systems

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Diagnosis without doctors.James G. Mazoué - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (6):559-579.
Competing conceptions of diagnostic reasoning – is there a way out?Reidun Førde - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (1):59-72.
Model-based and manipulative abduction in science.Lorenzo Magnani - 2004 - Foundations of Science 9 (3):219-247.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
31 (#488,695)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Ontic Account of Scientific Explanation.Carl F. Craver - 2014 - In Marie I. Kaiser, Oliver R. Scholz, Daniel Plenge & Andreas Hüttemann (eds.), Explanation in the Special Sciences: The Case of Biology and History. Springer Verlag. pp. 27-52.
Competing conceptions of diagnostic reasoning – is there a way out?Reidun Førde - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (1):59-72.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references