Mikael Stenmark, rationality in science, religion and everyday life: A critical evaluation of four models of rationality
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):190-192 (1997)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWilliam J. Collinge (1988). The Relation of Religious Community Life to Rationality in Augustine. Faith and Philosophy 5 (3):242-253.
Thomas D. Sullivan (1998). Rationality in Science, Religion, and Everyday Life. Faith and Philosophy 15 (3):394-397.
Mikael Stenmark (1997). An Unfinished Debate: What Are the Aims of Religion and Science? Zygon 32 (4):491-514.
Mikael Stenmark (2004). Should Religion Shape Science? Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):334-352.
Danny Frederick (2013). Popper, Rationality and the Possibility of Social Science. THEORIA 28 (1):61-75.
Vincent Brümmer (1999). How Rational is Rational Theology? A Reply to Mikael Stenmark. Religious Studies 35 (1):89-97.
Mikael Stenmark (2000). Theological Pragmatism: A Critical Evaluation. Heythrop Journal 41 (2):187–198.
Mikael Stenmark (1995). Rationality in Science, Religion and Everyday Life. University of Notre Dame Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads16 ( #74,758 of 549,130 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,130 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
