Non-contextuality, finite precision measurement and the Kochen–Specker theorem
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (2):151-176 (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesEhud Hrushovski & Itamar Pitowsky (2004). Generalizations of Kochen and Specker's Theorem and the Effectiveness of Gleason's Theorem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (2):177-194.
Itamar Pitowsky (2004). Generalizations of Kochen and Specker's Theorem and the Effectiveness of Gleason's Theorem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (2):177-194.
Tomasz Bigaj (2006). Do Quantum-Mechanical Systems Always Possess Definite Properties Dictated by Their States? Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):375-394.
D. M. Appleby (2005). The Bell–Kochen–Specker Theorem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 36 (1):1-28.
Rob Clifton (1995). Independently Motivating the Kochen-Dieks Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (1):33-57.
E. P. (1999). Two No-Go Theorems for Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 30 (3):403-431.
Richard Kaye (1991). A Generalization of Specker's Theorem on Typical Ambiguity. Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):458-466.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-01Total downloads4 ( #178,748 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
