Non-contextuality, finite precision measurement and the Kochen–Specker theorem

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsb.2003.10.003
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,831
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Asher Peres (2003). What's Wrong with These Observables? Foundations of Physics 33 (10):1543-1547.
Jason Zimba & Roger Penrose (1993). On Bell Non-Locality Without Probabilities: More Curious Geometry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (5):697-720.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Tomasz Bigaj (2006). Do Quantum-Mechanical Systems Always Possess Definite Properties Dictated by Their States? Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):375-394.
D. M. Appleby (2005). The Bell–Kochen–Specker Theorem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 36 (1):1-28.
E. P. (1999). Two No-Go Theorems for Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 30 (3):403-431.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

10 ( #227,445 of 1,724,771 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,121 of 1,724,771 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.