Punishing Cruelly: Punishment, Cruelty, and Mercy [Book Review]
Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (1):67-84 (2007)
|Abstract||What is cruelty? How and why does it matter? What do the legal rejection of cruelty and the requirements of mercy entail? This essay asks these questions of Lucius Seneca, who first articulated an agent-based conception of cruelty in the context of punishment. The hypothesis is submitted that the answers to these questions offered in Seneca's De clementia constitute one of the turning points in the evolution of practical reason in law. I conclude, however, by arguing that even the mainstream punitive practices of contemporary western societies fail to meet the modest imperatives of the rejection of cruelty and the unconditionality of mercy propounded by Seneca|
|Keywords||Punishment Cruelty Mercy Seneca Reflectivity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew Nicholas Rowan (2006). Animal Cruelty: Definitions and Sociology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):238-239.
Nick Zangwill (2006). Explaining Human Cruelty. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):245-246.
Harold Herzog & Arnold Arluke (2006). Human–Animal Connections: Recent Findings on the Anthrozoology of Cruelty. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):230-231.
Katy Tapper (2006). Predation Versus Competition and the Importance of Manipulable Causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):243-244.
G. Randolph Mayes (2009). Naturalizing Cruelty. Biology and Philosophy 24 (1):21–34.
Stephen Kershnar (2000). Mercy, Retributivism, and Harsh Punishment. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):209-224.
Mika Haritos-Fatouros (2006). Cruelty: A Dispositional or a Situational Behavior in Man? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):230-230.
John Tasioulas (2003). Mercy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (2):101–132.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #81,717 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?