Perspectives on Science 6 (3) (1998)
|Abstract||: We question the claim, common since Duhem, that sixteenth century astronomy, and especially the Wittenberg interpretation of Copernicus, was instrumentalistic rather than realistic. We identify a previously unrecognized Wittenberg astronomer, Edo Hildericus (Hilderich von Varel), who presents a detailed exposition of Copernicus's cosmology that is incompatible with instrumentalism. Quotations from other sixteenth century astronomers show that knowledge of the real configuration of the heavens was unattainable practically, rather than in principle. Astronomy was limited to quia demonstrations, although demonstration propter quid remained the ideal. We suggest that Osiander's notorious preface to Copernicus expresses these sixteenth century commonplaces rather than twentieth century instrumentalism, and that neither `realism', nor `instrumentalism', in their modern meanings, apply to sixteenth century astronomy|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
D. J. Raine (1986). GINGERICH, OWEN (Ed.) : Astrophysics and Twentieth-Century Astronomy to 1950, The General History of Astronomy, Vol. 4A. Cambridge University Press. Pp. X+198 (ISBN 0-521-24256-8). [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):510-513.
Nicholas Maxwell (1993). Does Orthodox Quantum Theory Undermine, or Support, Scientific Realism? Philosophical Quarterly 44 (171):139-157.
Robert I. Griffiths (1988). Was There a Crisis Before the Copernican Revolution? A Reappraisal of Gingerich's Criticisms of Kuhn. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:127 - 132.
F. Jamil Ragep (1990). Duhem, the Arabs, and the History of Cosmology. Synthese 83 (2):201 - 214.
Claudia Brosseder (2005). The Writing in the Wittenberg Sky: Astrology in Sixteenth-Century Germany. Journal of the History of Ideas 66 (4):557-576.
Richard H. Popkin (1966). The Philosophy of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. New York, Free Press.
Peter Barker (1990). Copernicus, the Orbs, and the Equant. Synthese 83 (2):317 - 323.
Michael H. Shank (2002). Regiomontanus on Ptolemy, Physical Orbs, and Astronomical Fictionalism: Goldsteinian Themes in the "Defense of Theon Against George of Trebizond". Perspectives on Science 10 (2):179-207.
Peter Barker (2002). Constructing Copernicus. Perspectives on Science 10 (2):208-227.
Elliott Sober (2001). Instrumentalism Revisited. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001 (91):3 - 39.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #68,499 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?