Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Jonathan Barnes (ed.)
Editions De La Maison des Sciences De L'Homme (1982)
The five hundred years from 300 B.C. to A.D. 200 were a period during which Greek science made spectacular advances and Greek philosophy underwent dramatic changes. How much did the scientists take note of the philosophical issues bearing on their pursuits? What progress did the philosophers make with methodological and theoretical issues arising out of developments in science? What influence did philosophical criticism or philosophical ideas have on specific theories in medicine or mechanics, mathematics or astronomy? These are some of the questions discussed in this series of papers by the distinguished scholars who took part in the Confe;rence Hellenistique in Paris in 1980. The result is a broad-ranging and pioneering volume which will be of importance to scholars in the history and philosophy of science and to those whose interests lie in classical philosophy.
|Keywords||Science Philosophy Science Methodology Science History Philosophy, Ancient|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$84.93 used $610.62 new Amazon page|
|Call number||Q175.S4175 1982|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jeff Kochan (2009). The Exception Makes the Rule: Reply to Howson. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (2):213-216.
Ronald H. Epp (1985). Stoicism Bibliography. Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (S1):125-171.
Similar books and articles
Rein Vihalemm (ed.) (2001). Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
David L. Hull (2000). The Professionalization of Science Studies: Cutting Some Slack. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 15 (1):61-91.
Barry Gholson (ed.) (1989). Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience. Cambridge University Press.
Michael R. Matthews (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
Eduard Glas (1979). Chemistry and Physiology in Their Historical and Philosophical Relations. Delft University Press.
James T. Cushing (1998). Philosophical Concepts in Physics: The Historical Relation Between Philosophy and Scientific Theories. Cambridge University Press.
John Losee (1987). Philosophy of Science and Historical Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
David Stump (1992). Naturalized Philosophy of Science with a Plurality of Methods. Philosophy of Science 59 (3):456-460.
Roger Ariew (1986). Descartes as Critic of Galileo's Scientific Methodology. Synthese 67 (1):77 - 90.
Harry M. Hine (1984). Philosophy and Science in the Hellenistic World Jonathan Barnes, Jacques Brunschwig, Myles Burnyeat, Malcolm Schofield (Edd.): Science and Speculation. Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice. Pp. Xxviii + 351; 1 Table. Cambridge & Paris: Cambridge University Press and Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme, 1982. £25. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 34 (02):213-215.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?