Philosophical Review 113 (1):89-100 (2004)
|Abstract||Milk, sand, plastic, uranium, wood, carbon, and oil are kinds of stuff. The sand in Hawaii, the uranium in North Korea, and the oil in Iraq are portions of stuff. Not everyone believes in portions of stuff.1 Those who do are likely to agree that, whatever their more specific natures, portions of stuff can at least be identified with mereological sums of their subportions.2 It seems after all trivial that a given portion of stuff just is all of its subportions combined—not by a spatiotemporal or any other substantive unifying relation, but by a mere principle of summation, a principle requiring that, if some things exist, there exists the sum, or collection, of those things.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mark Steen (2011). More Problems for MaxCon: Contingent Particularity and Stuff-Thing Coincidence. Acta Analytica 26 (2):135-154.
Wolfgang Mann & Achille C. Varzi (2006). Foreword. Journal of Philosophy 103 (12):593-596.
G. Bealer (1975). Predication and Matter. Synthese 31 (3-4):493 - 508.
Ralph Wedgwood (2003). Choosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly. In Sarah Stroud & Christine Tappolet (eds.), Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality. Oxford University Press.
Henry Laycock (2006). Words Without Objects. Clarendon Press Oxford.
Shieva Kleinschmidt (2007). Some Things About Stuff. Philosophical Studies 135 (3):407 - 423.
Maureen Donnelly & Thomas Bittner (2009). Summation Relations and Portions of Stuff. Philosophical Studies 143 (2):167 - 185.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #36,464 of 548,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,799 of 548,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?