Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 67 (4):680-703 (2000)
|Abstract||In this paper I describe the history of the surreal trajectories problem and argue that in fact it is not a problem for Bohm's theory. More specifically, I argue that one can take the particle trajectories predicted by Bohm's theory to be the actual trajectories that particles follow and that there is no reason to suppose that good particle detectors are somehow fooled in the context of the surreal trajectories experiments. Rather than showing that Bohm's theory predicts the wrong particle trajectories or that it somehow prevents one from making reliable measurements, such experiments ultimately reveal the special role played by position and the fundamental incompatibility between Bohm's theory and relativity. They also provide a striking example of the theory-ladenness of observation|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Roderich Tumulka, Detlef Durr, Sheldon Goldstein & Nino Zanghi, Bohmian Mechanics. Compendium of Quantum Physics.
A. Matzkin & V. Nurock, Are Bohmian Trajectories Real? On the Dynamical Mismatch Between de Broglie-Bohm and Classical Dynamics in Semiclassical Systems.
Wayne C. Myrvold (2003). On Some Early Objections to Bohm's Theory. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):7 – 24.
Peter J. Lewis (2007). How Bohm's Theory Solves the Measurement Problem. Philosophy of Science 74 (5):749-760.
Abraham D. Stone (1994). Does the Bohm Theory Solve the Measurement Problem? Philosophy of Science 61 (2):250-266.
Jeffrey A. Barrett (1995). The Distribution Postulate in Bohm's Theory. Topoi 14 (1):45-54.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #53,612 of 739,303 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,303 )
How can I increase my downloads?