The Role of Apologies in Professional Discipline
Legal Ethics 14 (1):49-72 (2011)
| Abstract | This article considers the common social act of apologising in the context of professional discipline of lawyers in Australia. It is argued that other social contexts in which an apology occurs, and the meanings generated, inform its use within this legal context. It is from the social meaning that apologies can be used as a legitimate way to gain insights into a person's ethical state of mind in disciplinary hearings. However, there are a range of difficulties, both practical and theoretical, posed in importing a social symbol into a legal context. The article considers issues concerning the process of discipline, the dangers of the act becoming purely instrumental and interpretive difficulties. Finally, the nature of the entry controls applying to lawyers - the 'character test' - is itself contestable. The article argues that, despite this constraint, apologies provide a useful evidential tool to gauge a lawyer's ethical awareness without relying on assumptions about fixed personality traits. Finally, the article argues for a greater emphasis on alternative sanctioning options, such as those which require the lawyer to demonstrate his or her remorse or fulfil a promise over time. It then turns to the question of whether an (ordered) apology should be one of the available sanctions | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesErnesto Verdeja (2010). Official Apologies in the Aftermath of Political Violence. Metaphilosophy 41 (4):563-581.
Nick Smith (2005). The Categorical Apology. Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (4):473–496.
Alexander A. Guerrero (2012). Lawyers, Context, and Legitimacy: A New Theory of Legal Ethics. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 25 (1):107-164.
Luc Bovens (2008). Apologies. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):219-239.
Nienke Doornbos & Leny E. de Groot-Van Leeuwen (2012). Incorrigible Advocates. Legal Ethics 15 (2):335-355.
Mathias Thaler (2012). Just Pretending: Political Apologies for Historical Injustice and Vice's Tribute to Virtue. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (3):259-278.
Donna Buckingham (2012). Putting the Legal House in Order: Responses to New Zealand Lawyers Who Break Trust. Legal Ethics 15 (2):315-334.
Richard L. Abel (2012). Comparative Studies of Lawyer Deviance and Discipline. Legal Ethics 15 (2):187-195.
Glen Pettigrove & Jordan Collins (2011). Apologizing for Who I Am. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (2):137-150.
David P. Boyd (2011). Art and Artifice in Public Apologies. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (3):299-309.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-07-12Total downloads7 ( #134,900 of 556,805 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,010 of 556,805 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
