Abstract

Prejudices shape human understanding in many ways, whether this occurs at the individual or at the collective level. Even philosophers, considered as a collective, often indulge in the uncritical acceptance of determinate opinions, which Tradition and Authority have thoroughly institutionalized. It is the task of scholarly “voices out of the choir” to challenge such “sanctified” presumptions. Forty years ago, for instance, Thomas Kuhn provided an excellent case of corrosive unmasking concerning the social construction of scientific categories; around the same time, Pall Ardal pursued an analogous work of philosophical uncovering about the alleged irrationalism of David Hume’s theory of passions; ten years later, it was Gilles Deleuze’s goal to demolish the standard Freudian interpretation of sadomasochism. It is now time for Cary Nederman to attack the received view of the history of Western religious tolerance.