Philo 14 (2):137-160 (2011)
|Abstract||Some philosophers have argued that the concepts of evil and wickedness cannot be well grasped by those inclined to a naturalist bent, perhaps because evil is so intimately tied to religious discourse or because it is ultimately not possible to understand evil, period. By contrast, I argue that evil—or, at least, what it is to be an evil person—can be understood by naturalist philosophers, and I articulate an independently plausible account of evil character|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James Rachels (1997). Punishment and Desert. In Hugh LaFollette - (ed.), Ethics in Practice. Basil Blackwell.
Marcus G. Singer (2004). The Concept of Evil. Philosophy 79 (2):185-214.
Sami Santanen (2010). Wickedness Inscribed in Freedom : Jean-Luc Nancy on Evil. In Ari Hirvonen & Janne Porttikivi (eds.), Law and Evil: Philosophy, Politics, Psychoanalysis. Routledge.
Mary Midgley (1984). Wickedness: A Philosophical Essay. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Cyril Edwin Mitchinson Joad (1939). Guide to Modern Wickedness. London, Faber and Faber Limited.
Ronald D. Milo (1983). Wickedness. American Philosophical Quarterly 20 (1):69 - 79.
Ronald D. Milo (1998). Virtue, Knowledge, and Wickedness. Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (01):196-.
S. I. Benn (1985). Wickedness. Ethics 95 (4):795-810.
Mary Midgley (1984/2001). Wickedness. Routledge.
Added to index2009-06-09
Total downloads277 ( #767 of 722,856 )
Recent downloads (6 months)103 ( #200 of 722,856 )
How can I increase my downloads?