Company Support for Employee Volunteering: A National Survey of Companies in Canada
Journal of Business Ethics 85:387 - 398 (2009)
| Abstract | Company support for employee volunteerism (CSEV) benefits companies, employees, and society while helping companies meet the expectations of corporate social responsibility (CSR). A nationally representative telephone survey of 990 Canadian companies examined CSEV through the lens of Porter and Kramer's (2006, 'Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility', Harvard Business Review, 78-92.) CSR model. The results demonstrated that Canadian companies passively support employee volunteerism in a variety of ways, such as allowing employees to take time off without pay (71%) or adjusting their work schedules (78%). These Responsive CSR efforts contribute to the company's value chain by enhancing employee morale, a perceived CSEV benefit. More active forms of support requiring company time or money are less common; for example, 29% allow time off with pay. Companies perceive that support for employee volunteering enhances their public image, a Responsive CSR strategy when employed to ameliorate a damaged reputation or a Strategic CSR strategy when contributing to a competitive position. A minority perceive challenges like covering the workload. Many companies target and/or exclude particular causes and link CSEV efforts with other philanthropic donations, suggesting a Strategic CSR application of CSEV. Where programs exist, they frequently are neither tracked nor evaluated, suggesting that companies are not using these programs as strategically as they might | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Lutz Preuss & Jack Perschke (2010). Slipstreaming the Larger Boats: Social Responsibility in Medium-Sized Businesses. Journal of Business Ethics 92 (4).
Virgilio M. Panapanaan, Lassi Linnanen, Minna-Maari Karvonen & Vinh Tho Phan (2003). Roadmapping Corporate Social Responsibility in Finnish Companies. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2/3):133 - 148.
C. B. Bhattacharya, Daniel Korschun & Sankar Sen (2009). Strengthening Stakeholder–Company Relationships Through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics 85:257 - 272.
Ivana S. Mijatovic & Dusan Stokic (forthcoming). The Influence of Internal and External Codes on Csr Practice: The Case of Companies Operating in Serbia. Journal of Business Ethics.
Thomas Hanke & Wolfgang Stark (2009). Strategy Development: Conceptual Framework on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 85:507 - 516.
M. Gunawan Alif & Retno Artsanti (2009). Nutrition for Kids Was Good for the Company. International Corporate Responsibility Series 4:349-366.
Hens Runhaar & Helene Lafferty (2009). Governing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Assessment of the Contribution of the Un Global Compact to Csr Strategies in the Telecommunications Industry. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (4):479 - 495.
Hae-Ryong Kim, Moonkyu Lee, Hyoung-Tark Lee & Na-Min Kim (forthcoming). Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee–Company Identification. Journal of Business Ethics.
Dick Gilder, Theo N. M. Schuyt & Melissa Breedijk (2005). Effects of an Employee Volunteering Program on the Work Force: The ABN-AMRO Case. Journal of Business Ethics 61 (2):143 - 152.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads19 ( #64,282 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |

