David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):233-247 (2002)
The human subjects researchmodel is increasingly invoked in discussions ofethics for Internet research. Here we seek toquestion the widespread application of thismodel, critiquing it through the two themes ofspace and textual form. Drawing on ourexperience of a previous piece ofresearch, we highlightthe implications of re-considering thetextuality of the Internet in addition to thespatial metaphors that are more commonlydeployed to describe Internet activity. Weargue that the use of spatial metaphors indescriptions of the Internet has shaped theadoption of the human subjects research model.Whilst this model is appropriate in some areasof Internet research such as emailcommunication, we feel that researchers, whennavigating the complex terrain of Internetresearch ethics, need also to consider theInternet as cultural production of texts.
|Keywords||community ethics human subjects Internet LGBT research space texts|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Henrik Eriksson, Mats Christiansen, Jessica Holmgren, Annica Engström & Martin Salzmann-Erikson (2014). Nursing Under the Skin: A Netnographic Study of Metaphors and Meanings in Nursing Tattoos. Nursing Inquiry 21 (4):318-326.
Barry Rooke (2013). Four Pillars of Internet Research Ethics with Web 2.0. Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (4):265-268.
Annette Markham (2006). Ethic as Method, Method as Ethic: A Case for Reflexivity in Qualitative ICT Research. Journal of Information Ethics 15 (2):37-54.
Similar books and articles
Chat Garcia Ramilo, Who is Ruling the Internet? Gender Sensitive Research Into Internet Censorship as a Central Area of Internet Governance.
Sami Alsmadi (2008). Marketing Research Ethics: Researcher's Obligations Toward Human Subjects. Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):153-160.
Melinda C. Bier, Stephen A. Sherblom & Michael A. Gallo (1996). Ethical Issues in a Study of Internet Use: Uncertainty, Responsibility, and the Spirit of Research Relationships. Ethics and Behavior 6 (2):141 – 151.
Heather A. Kitchin (2003). The Tri-Council Policy Statement and Research in Cyberspace: Research Ethics, the Internet, and Revising a 'Living Document'. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (4):397-418.
Michelle N. Meyer (2010). Against One-Size-Fits-All Research Ethics. Hastings Center Report 40 (5):10-11.
Heidi E. Keller & Sandra Lee (2003). Ethical Issues Surrounding Human Participants Research Using the Internet. Ethics and Behavior 13 (3):211 – 219.
Craig A. Childress & Joy K. Asamen (1998). The Emerging Relationship of Psychology and the Internet: Proposed Guidelines for Conducting Internet Intervention Research. Ethics and Behavior 8 (1):19 – 35.
Amy Bruckman (2002). Studying the Amateur Artist: A Perspective on Disguising Data Collected in Human Subjects Research on the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):217-231.
Joseph B. Walther (2002). Research Ethics in Internet-Enabled Research: Human Subjects Issues and Methodological Myopia. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):205-216.
Michele White (2002). Representations or People? Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):249-266.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #103,289 of 1,911,031 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #253,496 of 1,911,031 )
How can I increase my downloads?