David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):260-265 (1996)
I have argued previously (in this journal) that the reality of pervasive religious pluralism obligates a believer to attempt to establish her perspective as the correct one. In a recent response, Jerome Gellman maintains that the believer who affirms a ‘religious epistemology’ is under no such obligation in that she need not subject her religious beliefs to any ‘rule of rationality’. In this paper I contend that there do exist some rules of rationality (some epistemic obligations) that must be acknowledged-and satisfied-within all epistemic systems (including all religious epistemic systems) and that for this reason Gellman’s critique of my position fails
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jerome I. Gellman (1998). Epistemic Peer Conflict and Religious Belief. Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):229-235.
Jerome Gellman (1993). Religious Diversity and the Epistemic Justification of Religious Belief. Faith and Philosophy 10 (3):345-364.
Jerome Gellman (2000). In Defence of a Contented Religious Exclusivism. Religious Studies 36 (4):401-417.
Jeroen de Ridder (2011). Religious Exclusivism Unlimited. Religious Studies 47 (4):449-463.
Andrew Koehl (2005). On Blanket Statements About the Epistemic Effects of Religious Diversity. Religious Studies 41 (4):395-414.
Thomas Schmidt (1999). Religious Pluralism and Democratic Society: Political Liberalism and the Reasonableness of Religious Beliefs. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (4):43-56.
Merold Westphal (1999). The Politics of Religious Pluralism. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:1-8.
William P. Alston (1999). What Is Distinctive About the Epistemology of Religious Belief? The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:91-102.
Amir Dastmalchian (2009). Religious Diversity in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion: The ‘Ambiguity’ Objection to Epistemic Exclusivism. Dissertation, King's College London
David Basinger (1991). Plantinga, Pluralism and Justified Religious Belief. Faith and Philosophy 8 (1):67-80.
John Hick (1997). The Epistemological Challenge of Religious Pluralism. Faith and Philosophy 14 (3):277-286.
Linda Zagzebski (2011). First Person and Third Person Reasons and Religious Epistemology. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):285 - 304.
Stephen Phillips (2006). The Challenge of Religious Pluralism: A Reply to James Kraft. Sophia 45 (2):123-126.
David Basinger (1988). Hick's Religious Pluralism and “Reformed Epistemology”. Faith and Philosophy 5 (4):421-432.
Amir Dastmalchian (2009). Religious Ambiguity in Hick’s Religious Pluralism. International Journal of Hekmat 1:75-89.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads9 ( #165,488 of 1,101,812 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #91,766 of 1,101,812 )
How can I increase my downloads?