Reconciling Historical Injustices: Deliberative Democracy and the Politics of Reconciliation
Res Publica 18 (2):127-143 (2012)
| Abstract | Deliberative democracy is often celebrated and endorsed because of its promise to include, empower, and emancipate otherwise oppressed and excluded social groups through securing their voice and granting them impact in reasoned public deliberation. This article explores the ability of Habermas’ theory of deliberative democracy to accommodate the demands of historically excluded social groups in democratic plural societies. It argues that the inclusive, transformative, and empowering potential of Habermas’ theory of deliberative democracy falters when confronted with particular types of historical injustices. It falters because it pays little attention to the historical dimension of injustices and the demands to which it gives rise. The historical dimension of longstanding injustices, it is argued, gives rise to a set of distinctive demands, such as collective memory of exclusion, acknowledgement of historical injustices, taking responsibility, and offering apology and reparations for causing these injustices, which go beyond the type of democratic inclusion that is often offered by deliberative democracy. Yet, the solution is not to abandon the model of deliberative democracy. Quite the contrary, it remains a valuable basis for forward-looking political decision making. The article concludes that in order to achieve inclusive, empowering and transformative deliberation in consolidated democracies that have experienced historical injustices, the politics of reconciliation is indispensable | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJoshua Cohen (2009). Philosophy, Politics, Democracy: Selected Essays. Harvard University Press.
Andrew Schaap (2006). Agonism in Divided Societies. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):255-277.
John S. Dryzek (2005). Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia. Political Theory 33 (2):218 - 242.
Denise Vitale (2006). Between Deliberative and Participatory Democracy: A Contribution on Habermas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (6):739-766.
William Smith (2004). Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica 10 (4).
Philip Pettit (2004). Depoliticizing Democracy. Ratio Juris 17 (1):52-65.
Manfred Berg & Bernd Schäfer (eds.) (2009). Historical Justice in International Perspective: How Societies Are Trying to Right the Wrongs of the Past. Cambridge University Press.
John Parkinson (2006). Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. OUP Oxford.
Gregory F. Pappas (spring 2008). "John Dewey and the Contemporary 'Deliberative Turn' in Political Theory," Southwest Philosophical Studies 30 (Spring 2008), 71-78. [REVIEW] Southwest Philosophical Studies 30 (Spring 2008), 71-78 30:71-78.
Judith Squires (0040). Deliberation, Domination and Decision-Making. Theoria (=117;User_Persona=false;ord=1234):104-133.
James Fishkin (2005). Defending Deliberation: A Comment on Ian Shapiro'sThe State of Democratic Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (1):71-78.
Noëlle McAfee (2008). Democracy and the Political Unconscious. Columbia University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-07-30Total downloads33 ( #36,464 of 548,974 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,974 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
