David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphysica 13 (1):27-41 (2012)
Russell’s critique of substance monism is an ideal starting point from which to understand some main concepts in Spinoza’s difficult metaphysics. This paper provides an in-depth examination of Spinoza’s proof that only one substance exists. On this basis, it rejects Russell’s interpretation of Spinoza’s theory of reality as founded upon the logical doctrine that all propositions consist of a predicate and a subject. An alternative interpretation is offered: Spinoza’s substance is not a bearer of properties, as Russell implied, but an eternally active, self-actualizing creative power. Eventually, Spinoza the Monist and Russell the Pluralist are at one in holding that process and activity rather than enduring things are the most fundamental realities
|Keywords||Russell Spinoza Substance Monism Attribute Power|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Pierfrancesco Basile (2010). Kant, Spinoza, and the Metaphysics of the Ontological Proof. Metaphysica 11 (1):17-37.
E. M. Curley (1969). Spinoza's Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Willis Doney (1980). Spinoza's Ontological Proof. In Richard Kennington (ed.), The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza. Catholic University of America Press.
Harold H. Joachim (1901/1964). A Study of the Ethics of Spinoza. New York, Russell & Russell, Inc..
Steven M. Nadler (2006). Spinoza's Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ghislain Guigon (2011). Spinoza on Composition and Priority. In Philip Goff (ed.), Spinoza on Monism. Palgrave Macmillan.
T. Allan Hillman (2008). The Early Russell on the Metaphysics of Substance in Leibniz and Bradley. Synthese 163 (2):245 - 261.
Andreas Schmidt (2009). Substance Monism and Identity Theory in Spinoza. In Olli Koistinen (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Jon Miller (2009). Spinoza and the Stoics on Substance Monism. In Olli Koistinen (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Francesca di Poppa (2010). Spinoza and Process Ontology. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):272-294.
George Louis Kline (1952/1981). Spinoza in Soviet Philosophy: A Series of Essays, Selected and Translated, and with an Introduction. Hyperion Press.
A. D. Smith (2014). Spinoza, Gueroult, and Substance. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (3):655-688.
Marx W. Wartofsky (1977). Nature, Number and Individuals: Motive and Method in Spinoza's Philosophy. Inquiry 20 (1-4):457 – 479.
Jasper Reid (2013). Henry More and Nicolas Malebranche's Critiques of Spinoza. European Journal of Philosophy 22 (3).
Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2011). Why Spinoza is Not an Eleatic Monist (Or Why Diversity Exists). In Philip Goff (ed.), Spinoza on Monism. Palgrave.
Paul Wienpahl (1971). Ch'an Buddhism, Western Thought, and the Concept of Substance. Inquiry 14 (1-4):84 – 101.
Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2010). Acosmism or Weak Individuals?: Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite. Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):pp. 77-92.
Jonathan Bennett (1965). A Note on Descartes and Spinoza. Philosophical Review 74 (3):379-380.
Ohad Nachtomy (2011). A Tale of Two Thinkers, One Meeting, and Three Degrees of Infinity: Leibniz and Spinoza (1675–8). British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5):935-961.
Added to index2011-12-08
Total downloads69 ( #21,213 of 1,102,722 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #29,556 of 1,102,722 )
How can I increase my downloads?