David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Decision theorists generally object to “honoring sunk costs” – that is, treating the fact that some cost has been incurred in the past as a reason for action, apart from the consideration of expected consequences. This paper critiques the doctrine that sunk costs should never be honored on three levels. As background, the rationale for the doctrine is explained. Then it is shown that if it is always irrational to honor sunk costs, then other common and uncontroversial practices are also irrational. Second, it is argued that there is no satisfactory way to make a distinction between the two kinds of cases. Third, a proposal is developed which would explain how it could be rational, under certain circumstances, to honor sunk costs.
|Keywords||Sunk costs Decision Theory Rationality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Douglas W. Portmore (2007). Welfare, Achievement, and Self-Sacrifice. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 2 (2):1-28.
A. Ross Otto (2010). Three Attempts to Replicate the Behavioral Sunk-Cost Effect: A Note on Cunha and Caldieraro (2009). Cognitive Science 34 (8):1379-1383.
David Johnstone (2002). Behavioral and Prescriptive Explanations of a Reverse Sunk Cost Effect. Theory and Decision 53 (3):209-242.
Marcus Cunha & Fabio Caldieraro (2010). On the Observability of Purely Behavioral Sunk-Cost Effects: Theoretical and Empirical Support for the BISC Model. Cognitive Science 34 (8):1384-1387.
David Ramsay Steele (1996). Nozick on Sunk Costs. Ethics 106 (3):605-620.
Theodore Pavlic & Kevin Passino (2011). The Sunk-Cost Effect as an Optimal Rate-Maximizing Behavior. Acta Biotheoretica 59 (1):53-66.
Kevin M. Passino (forthcoming). The Sunk-Cost Effect as an Optimal Rate-Maximizing Behavior. Acta Biotheoretica.
Douglas Walton (2002). The Sunk Costs Fallacy or Argument From Waste. Argumentation 16 (4):473-503.
António Zilhão (2010). Incontinence, Honouring Sunk Costs and Rationality. In. In Mauricio Suarez, Mauro Dorato & Miklos Redei (eds.), Epsa Philosophical Issues in the Sciences. Springer. 303--310.
Added to index2009-12-08
Total downloads21 ( #80,176 of 1,099,017 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #287,293 of 1,099,017 )
How can I increase my downloads?