Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 78 (3):389 - 400 (2008)
|Abstract||This article explores links between the modern theory of rational choice and ethics. Ethics allows us to answer an unsolved question in modern decision theory: the structuring problem in decisions. Such a problem cannot be solved coming from the principle of expected utility. This principle can solve the problem of ‚choosing’ among given alternatives, but does not establish which alternatives should be taken into account in decision. In order to understand the structuring problem, the act of ‚choosing’ has to be completed with three human acts: operating, predicting and evaluating. At the same time, the subjective criteria of rational choice – probability and utility – have to be completed with three objective criteria: efficiency, truth and goodness. Utility is a subjective value of an alternative considered in relation to another. Efficiency, truth and goodness are objective qualities of the joint alternatives in relation to the reality: the real operating possibilities of the agent, the real possibilities of his environment and the true good produced. So, the rule that guarantees a decision to be optimal would be: “do that which most certainly maximises our preferences, according to real operative resources, true knowledge and the right will”. However, this rule cannot be applied without the development of virtues, which could be seen as the main moral competences in decision-making.|
|Keywords||Aquinas Aristotle decision-making ethics theory of the choice virtues|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Cantwell (2010). On an Alleged Counter-Example to Causal Decision Theory. Synthese 173 (2):127 - 152.
Paul Weirich (1986). Expected Utility and Risk. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):419-442.
Wilfrid I. Card (1980). Rational Justification for Therapeutic Decisions. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1 (1):11-28.
Reed Richter (1984). Rationality Revisited. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (4):392 – 403.
Martin Peterson (2009). An Introduction to Decision Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Pablo Fernandez-Berrocal & Natalio Extremera (2005). About Emotional Intelligence and Moral Decisions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):548-549.
John R. Welch (2012). Real-Life Decisions and Decision Theory. In Sabine Roeser, Rafaela Hillerbrand, Per Sandin & Martin Peterson (eds.), Handbook of Risk Theory. Springer.
Darren Bradley (2013). Decision Theory, Philosophical Perspectives. In Hal Pashler (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Mind. Sage.
Paul Weirich (2010). Utility and Framing. Synthese 176 (1):83 - 103.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #189,470 of 740,456 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,456 )
How can I increase my downloads?