David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Analysis 69 (2):382-385 (2009)
Ernest Sosa's A Virtue Epistemology, Vol. I is arguably the single-most important monograph to be published in analytic epistemology in the last ten years. Sosa , the first in the field to employ the notion of intellectual virtue – in his ground-breaking ‘The Raft and the Pyramid’– is the leading proponent of reliabilist versions of virtue epistemology. In A Virtue Epistemology, he deftly defends an externalist account of animal knowledge as apt belief , argues for a distinction between animal and reflective knowledge , contends that rational intuition is an intellectual virtue ; and offers responses to dream scepticism , the problem of the criterion and the value problem . Nearly all of these arguments are new, albeit consistent with Sosa's earlier work; that is, consistent with two notable exceptions. First, c ontra Sosa's ‘Replies’ in Ernest Sosa and His Critics, A Virtue Epistemology explicitly contends that safety is not required for animal knowledge. Second, unlike Sosa's Knowledge in Perspective , which arguably construes the intellectual virtues as merely instrumentally valuable, A Virtue Epistemology explicitly contends that the intellectual virtues are instrumentally and constitutively valuable . Best read in conjunction with the above monographs and Epistemic Justification , A Virtue Epistemology is mandatory reading for epistemologists and graduate students in the field. It will rightly set the standard for debates in analytic epistemology for years to come.I will summarize and raise objections to two key conclusions that are unique to A Virtue Epistemology: the ‘kaleidoscope-perceiver’ has animal knowledge but lacks reflective knowledge; unlike the k-perceiver, the ordinary perceiver has reflective knowledge. My objections ….
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ernest Sosa (1980). The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence Versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):3-26.
Citations of this work BETA
Clayton Littlejohn (2014). Fake Barns and False Dilemmas. Episteme 11 (4):369-389.
Similar books and articles
Anne Meylan (2009). A Virtue Epistemology. Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge – by E. Sosa. Dialectica 63 (1):85-89.
Frederick F. Schmitt (2009). Review of Ernest Sosa, Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume Ii. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (8).
Ernest Sosa (2011). Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume Ii. OUP Oxford.
Jonah N. Schupbach (2010). Review of Ernest Sosa, Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume II. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 63 (3):722-724.
B. Hunter & A. Morton (2010). Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume II, by Ernest Sosa. Mind 119 (475):856-860.
Richard Umbers (2010). Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology. By Robert C. Roberts & W. Jay Wood and A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge. By Ernest Sosa. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 51 (2):333-335.
H. Battaly (2010). Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume II * by Ernest Sosa. Analysis 70 (2):388-391.
Ram Neta (2008). Review of Ernest Sosa, A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume 1. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (5).
A. Morton (2010). A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume 1, by Ernest Sosa. Mind 118 (472):1180-1183.
Added to index2009-04-11
Total downloads116 ( #30,968 of 1,790,225 )
Recent downloads (6 months)20 ( #40,159 of 1,790,225 )
How can I increase my downloads?