Critical Inquiry: Considering the Context [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Argumentation 25 (2):243-253 (2011)
In this paper we discuss the relevance of considering context for critical thinking. We argue that critical thinking is best viewed in terms of ‘critical inquiry’ in which argumentation is seen as a way of arriving at reasoned judgments on complex issues. This is a dialectical process involving the comparative weighing of a variety of contending positions and arguments. Using the model which we have developed for teaching critical thinking as critical inquiry, we demonstrate the role played by the following aspects of context: (1) knowledge of the dialectical context (the debate around an issue, both current and historical); (2) an understanding of the current state of practice and belief surrounding an issue; (3) an understanding of the intellectual, political, historical and social contexts in which an issue is embedded; (4) knowledge of the relevant disciplinary context; (5) information about the sources of an argument; (6) awareness of one’s own beliefs and biases
|Keywords||Critical thinking Inquiry Context Reasoned judgments Dialectical|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mark Weinstein (2012). Critical Thinking From the Margins. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (2):5-14.
Maria Sanders & Jason Moulenbelt (2011). Defining Critical Thinking. Inquiry 26 (1):38-46.
Robert Ennis (1991). Critical Thinking. Teaching Philosophy 14 (1):4-18.
Richard Paul (2012). Reflections on the Nature of Critical Thinking, Its History, Politics, and Barriers and on Its Status Across the College/UniversityCurriculum Part II. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (1):5-30.
Linda Carroza (2012). Review of Reason in the Balance: An Inquiry Approach to Critical Thinking by Sharon Bailin and Mark Battersby. [REVIEW] Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (1):47-49.
Steve Cady (2004). Integrating Critical Thinking Into Daily Life. Inquiry 23 (3):33-36.
Mary Vasudeva & Stuart Keeley (2004). Critical Thinking as a Constructive Rather Than Destructive Force in Interpersonal Relationships. Inquiry 23 (3):17-22.
Andrea Giampetro-Meyer (2004). The Social Fallout of Critical Thinking. Inquiry 23 (3):27-31.
Carlos Saiz & Ana M. Nieto (2010). Critical Thinking: A Question of Aptitude and Attitude? Inquiry 25 (2):19-26.
Suzanne Miller (2005). The Dialogue of Creative and Critical Thinking. Inquiry 24 (4):37-43.
Claude Gratton (2013). Sharon Bailin and Mark Battersby: Reason in Balance: An Inquiry Approach to Critical Thinking. [REVIEW] Argumentation 27 (1):93-96.
Gerald Nosich (2010). From Argument and Philosophy to Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum. Inquiry 25 (3):4-13.
Claire Phillips & Susan Green (2011). Faculty as Critical Thinkers. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (2):44-50.
Qingyin Liang & Yun Xie (2011). How Critical is the Dialectical Tier? Argumentation 25 (2):229-242.
Claude Gratton (2001). Critical Thinking and Emotional Well-Being. Inquiry 20 (3):39-51.
Added to index2011-04-14
Total downloads16 ( #113,922 of 1,410,167 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #94,935 of 1,410,167 )
How can I increase my downloads?