Comments on Foster's 'On Tarski's theory of logical consequence--a reply to Bates'

Southwest Philosophy Review 16 (2):191-194 (2000)
Abstract In the present commentary, I argue that Foster has attacked an uncharitable reconstruction of Etchemendy's argument against Tarski's account of the logical properties. I provide an alternative, more charitable reconstruction of that argument that withstands Foster's objections.
Keywords logical consequence  Tarski  Etchemendy
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,705
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Greg Ray (1996). Logical Consequence: A Defense of Tarski. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (6):617 - 677.
    Mario Gómez-Torrente (1998). On a Fallacy Attributed to Tarski. History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (4):227-234.
    William H. Hanson (1999). Ray on Tarski on Logical Consequence. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (6):605-616.
    Timothy Bays (2001). On Tarski on Models. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1701-1726.
    Chris Foster (2000). On Tarski's Theory of Logical Consequence. Southwest Philosophy Review 16 (1):125-132.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-07-26

    Total downloads

    11 ( #99,611 of 549,130 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #37,418 of 549,130 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums