Axiomathes 20 (2-3):333-346 (2010)
|Abstract||A widely accepted thesis in the philosophy of language is that natural language proper names are rigid designators, and that they are so de jure, or as a matter of the “semantic rules of the language.” This paper questions this claim, arguing that rigidity cannot be plausibly construed as a property of name types and that the alternative, rigidity construed as a property of tokens, means that they cannot be considered rigid de jure; rigidity in this case must be viewed as a pragmatic and not a semantic property|
|Keywords||Rigid designation Kripke Proper names Semantics Pragmatics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Pendlebury (1990). Why Proper Names Are Rigid Designators. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (3):519-536.
Berit Brogaard (2007). A Puzzle About Properties. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):635-650.
Jussi Haukioja (2006). Proto-Rigidity. Synthese 150 (2):155 - 169.
Corine Besson (2010). Rigidity, Natural Kind Terms, and Metasemantics. In Helen Beebee & Nigel Sabbarton-Leary (eds.), The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. Routledge.
Hugh S. Chandler (1975). Rigid Designation. Journal of Philosophy 72 (13):363-369.
David S. Schwarz (1978). Causality, Referring, and Proper Names. Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (2):225 - 233.
Benjamin Schnieder (2005). Property Designators, Predicates, and Rigidity. Philosophical Studies 122 (3):227 - 241.
Mark Textor (1998). Rigidity and De Jure Rigidity. Teorema 17 (1).
Peter Pagin (2008). Relational Modality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17 (3):307-322.
Added to index2010-06-09
Total downloads93 ( #9,056 of 722,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,857 )
How can I increase my downloads?