Better to exist: a reply to Benatar

Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (12):875-876 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A recent exchange on Benatar’s book Better never to have been between Doyal and Benatar discusses Benatar’s bold claim that people should not be brought into existence. Here, I expand the discussion of original position that the exchange focused on. I also discuss the asymmetries, between benefit and harm and between existence and non-existence, upon which Benatar’s bold claim rests. In both discussions, I show how Benatar’s bold claim can be rejected

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Grim news for an unoriginal position: a reply to Seth Baum.D. Benatar - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):328-329.
Is it wrong to impose the Harms of human life? A reply to Benatar.David DeGrazia - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (4):317-331.
How Best to Prevent Future Persons From Suffering: A Reply to Benatar.Brooke Alan Trisel - 2012 - South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):79-93.
Against moral theories: reply to Benatar.R. Lawlor - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):826-828.
The cioms's distributive justice principle: A reply to dr Benatar.D. R. Cooley - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (1):11-18.
Grim news from the original position: a reply to Professor Doyal.D. Benatar - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (10):577-577.
Teaching moral theories is an option: reply to Rob Lawlor.D. Benatar - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (6):395-396.
Problems and Solutions for a Hypothetical Right Not to Exist.Manolito Gallegos - 2011 - Logoi -- Heidelberger Graduiertenjournal für Geisteswissenschaften 1 (1):N/A.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
117 (#149,193)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?