Cybermedicine and the moral integrity of the physician–patient relationship

Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2):83-91 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some critiques of cybermedicine claim that it is problematic because it fails to create physician–patient relationships. But, electronically mediated encounters do create such relationships. The issue is the nature and quality of those relationships and whether they are conducive to good patient care and meet the ethical ideals and standards of medicine. In this paper, I argue that effective communication and compassion are, in most cases, necessary for the establishment of trusting and morally appropriate physician–patient relationships. The creation of these relationships requires patients and physicians to take psychological and emotional risks and to make commitments to each other. The problem is that by altering the form and content of verbal and non-verbal behaviors and by limiting the kinds of interactions that can take place, cybermedicine makes risk-free interactions easier and more commonplace and retards the development of physician compassion and patient trust. In doing so, cybermedicine encourages morally inappropriate physician–patient relationships. I argue that Merleau-Ponty''s notion of embodiment and Kierkegaard''s criticisms of disinterested reflection help us to understand how cybermedicine can undermine patient health and well being and why it should be seen as a possible threat to the moral integrity of physician–patient relationships

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In defense of paternalism.Erich H. Loewy - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (6):445-468.
Competition and the patient-centered ethic.George W. Rainbolt - 1987 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (1):85-99.
Informed consent: Patient's right or patient's duty?Richard T. Hull - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):183-198.
Does physician assisted suicide violate the integrity of medicine?Richard Momeyer - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1):13-24.
Physician and patient: Respect for mutuality.David Gary Smith & Lisa H. Newton - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
The Noncompliant Patient: A Kantian and Levinasian Response.P. Burcher - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):74-89.
Patients and profits.Mark Yarborough - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (1).
The doctor–patient relationship.Harry H. Gordon - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (3):243-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
66 (#221,685)

6 months
2 (#658,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Moral Difference between Faces & FaceTime.Kyle E. Karches - 2023 - Hastings Center Report 53 (4):16-25.
Cold technologies versus warm care? On affective and social relations with and through care technologies.Jeannette Pols & Ingunn Moser - 2009 - Alter - European Journal of Disability Research / Revue Européenne de Recherche Sur le Handicap 3 (2):159-178.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Bodies in Technology.Don Ihde - 2001 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
Bodies in Technology.Don Ihde - 2004 - Human Studies 27 (3):341-348.
Handbook of Phenomenology and Medicine.S. Kay Toombs (ed.) - 2001 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.

View all 10 references / Add more references