David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2):83-91 (2004)
Some critiques of cybermedicine claim that it is problematic because it fails to create physician–patient relationships. But, electronically mediated encounters do create such relationships. The issue is the nature and quality of those relationships and whether they are conducive to good patient care and meet the ethical ideals and standards of medicine. In this paper, I argue that effective communication and compassion are, in most cases, necessary for the establishment of trusting and morally appropriate physician–patient relationships. The creation of these relationships requires patients and physicians to take psychological and emotional risks and to make commitments to each other. The problem is that by altering the form and content of verbal and non-verbal behaviors and by limiting the kinds of interactions that can take place, cybermedicine makes risk-free interactions easier and more commonplace and retards the development of physician compassion and patient trust. In doing so, cybermedicine encourages morally inappropriate physician–patient relationships. I argue that Merleau-Ponty''s notion of embodiment and Kierkegaard''s criticisms of disinterested reflection help us to understand how cybermedicine can undermine patient health and well being and why it should be seen as a possible threat to the moral integrity of physician–patient relationships
|Keywords||communication compassion cybermedicine disembodiment disinterested reflection embodiment physician--patient relationship telepresence trust|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jeannette Pols (2010). The Heart of the Matter. About Good Nursing and Telecare. Health Care Analysis 18 (4):374.
Similar books and articles
Erich H. Loewy (2005). In Defense of Paternalism. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (6):445-468.
Harry H. Gordon (1983). The Doctor–Patient Relationship. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (3):243-256.
Edmund L. Erde & Anne Hudson Jones (1983). Diminished Capacity, Friendship, and Medical Paternalism: Two Case Studies From Fiction. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 4 (3).
Mark Yarborough (1986). Patients and Profits. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (1).
P. Burcher (2012). The Noncompliant Patient: A Kantian and Levinasian Response. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):74-89.
David Gary Smith & Lisa H. Newton (1984). Physician and Patient: Respect for Mutuality. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
Richard Momeyer (1995). Does Physician Assisted Suicide Violate the Integrity of Medicine? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1):13-24.
Richard T. Hull (1985). Informed Consent: Patient's Right or Patient's Duty? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):183-198.
George W. Rainbolt (1987). Competition and the Patient-Centered Ethic. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (1):85-99.
Christina M. van Der Feltz-Cornelis (2002). The Impact of Factitious Disorder on the Physician-Patient Relationship. An Epistemological Model. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (3):253-261.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #136,301 of 1,707,725 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #69,291 of 1,707,725 )
How can I increase my downloads?