Graduate studies at Western
International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):241-252 (2003)
|Abstract||People living in rural areas make up 20 percent of the U.S. population, but only 9 percent of physicians practice there. This uneven distribution is significant because rural areas have higher percentages of people in poverty, elderly people, people lacking health insurance coverage, and people with chronic diseases. As a way of ameliorating these disparities, e-health initiatives are being implemented. But the rural e-health movement raises its own set of distributive justice concerns about the digital divide. Moreover, even if the digital divide is overcome, e-health services may be of an inferior quality compared to face-to-face medical encounters. In this paper, I argue that before we can fully understand the distributive justice implications of e-health, we must first understand what distributive justice means. I argue that five elements—fairness, quality, accessibility, availability, and efficiency—constitute a general conception of justice and that all of these elements must be considered when evaluating e-health for rural health profession shortage areas. In doing so, it may be necessary to make important tradeoffs among these elements. I then examine the development of e-health programs in light of Rawls’s principle of equal opportunity and Daniels’s notion of species-typical functioning. I conclude that in the context of e-health, Rawls’s principle should be expanded to include geography as a prima facie morally relevant criterion for allocating healthcare benefits. I also conclude that Daniels’s notion of species-typical functioning provides grounds for thinking of health and some healthcare services as special goods|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Norman Daniels (2001). Justice, Health, and Healthcare. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):2 – 16.
Wilson James (2009). Not So Special After All? Daniels and the Social Determinants of Health. Journal of Medical Ethics 35:3 - 6..
Norman Daniels (2008). Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly. Cambridge University Press.
Guilhermina Rego, Cristina Brandão, Helena Melo & Rui Nunes (2002). Distributive Justice and the Introduction of Generic Medicines. Health Care Analysis 10 (2):221-229.
Anne Moates (2005). The Rural Urban Health Divide. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 11 (1):4.
M. Loi (2013). You Cannot Have Your Normal Functioning Cake and Eat It Too. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (12):748-751.
Shlomi Segall (2007). How Devolution Upsets Distributive Justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):257-272.
Andrew M. Courtwright (2007). Justice, Health, and Status. Theoria 54 (112):1-24.
Thomas Schramme (2007). The Significance of the Concept of Disease for Justice in Health Care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):121-135.
Leonard M. Fleck (1989). Just Health Care (II): Is Equality Too Much? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (4).
Wei Xiaopin (2008). Distributive Justice, Injustice and Beyond Justice. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:857-872.
Andrew Ward & Pamela Jo Johnson (2013). Necessary Health Care and Basic Needs: Health Insurance Plans and Essential Benefits. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 21 (4):355-371.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads5 ( #170,048 of 733,136 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 733,136 )
How can I increase my downloads?