Exclusion by inclusion? On difficulties with regard to an effective ethical assessment of patenting in the field of agricultural bio-technology
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (6):521-539 (2006)
In order to take ethical considerations of patenting biological material into account, the so-called “ordre public or morality clause” was implemented as Article 6 in the EC directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions, 98/44/EC. At first glance, this seems to provide a significant advantage to the European patent system with respect to ethics. The thesis of this paper argues that the ordre public or morality clause does not provide sufficient protection against ethically problematic uses of the patent system within the area of life. On the contrary, there are worrisome obstacles to any effective and comprehensive critical analysis of the ethical aspects of bio-patenting, especially in the field of agriculture. These obstacles can be seen as indirect consequences of the implementation of ethical considerations in form of the ordre public and morality clause in the EC Directive. Therefore, Article 6 of the EC Directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions seems to ultimately weaken the position of ethics in the debate concerning bio-patenting because the ordre public and morality clause is usually interpreted in an exclusively bio-ethical way in the sense of an “intrinsic ethics,” which is primarily interested in questions regarding the moral status of particular entities. It is argued that an important cause of this phenomenon is that the decisive reasons against bio-patenting are concerns of social ethics, and not bio-ethics
|Keywords||agricultural bio-technology EC bio-patenting directive ethics ordre public and morality clause patents|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jürgen Habermas (1998). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. The MIT Press.
Alan Gewirth (1978). Reason and Morality. University of Chicago Press.
Keith Douglass Warner (2001). Are Life Patents Ethical? Conflict Between Catholic Social Teaching and Agricultural Biotechnology's Patent Regime. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):301-319.
Rebecca S. Eisenberg (2002). How Can You Patent Genes? American Journal of Bioethics 2 (3):3 – 11.
Asterios Tsioumanis, Konstadinos Mattas & Elsa Tsioumani (2003). Is Policy Towards Intellectual Property Rights Addressing the Real Problems? The Case of Unauthorized Appropriation of Genetic Resources. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):605-616.
Citations of this work BETA
A. Wendy Russell & Robert Sparrow (2008). The Case for Regulating Intragenic Gmos. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (2):153-181.
Similar books and articles
Ruth McNally & Peter Wheale, Bio-Patenting and Innovation:Nomads of the Present and a New Global Order.
Hans Radder (2004). Exploiting Abstract Possibilities: A Critique of the Concept and Practice of Product Patenting. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (3):275-291.
Brigitte Jansen & Juergen Simon (2005). Some Ethical and Legal Issues in Germany Involving Informed Consent and Patenting. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):93-96.
Max Charlesworth (2005). Don't Blame the 'Bio' — Blame the 'Ethics': Varieties of (Bio) Ethics and the Challenge of Pluralism. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (1):10-17.
R. Stephen Crespi (2000). An Analysis of Moral Issues Affecting Patenting Inventions in the Life Sciences: A European Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):157-180.
Jose Elizalde (1998). The Patentability of Human Genes: An Ethical Debate in the European Community. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (3):318 – 323.
Stephen E. Wear, William H. Coles, Anthony H. Szczygiel, Adrianne McEvoy & Carl C. Pegels (1998). Patenting Medical and Surgical Techniques: An Ethical-Legal Analysis. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (1):75 – 97.
R. Stephen Crespi (2005). Ethico-Legal Issues in Biomedicine Patenting: A Patent Professional Viewpoint. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):117-136.
Rogeer Hoedemaekers (2001). Human Gene Patents: Core Issues in a Multi-Layered Debate. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):211-221.
Rafał Witek (2005). Ethics and Patentability in Biotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):105-111.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #213,899 of 1,796,448 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #282,641 of 1,796,448 )
How can I increase my downloads?